Title Text: it wasn't a very good offer but it had to be made, it's in the evil handbook
Yeet!

Your comment made me recall something from Shaman King (manga, and possibly new anime if it follows the manga as people say): Hao. UNCOVER ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITYPhycoKrusk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:00 am Anyone else think that Eudoant just needs a mother very, very badly?
Good point! King chose his transformation to a dog via Pete's magic and an uncertain future over a predictable enjoyable human lifespan. We all know, of course, that we'd all make the same choiceNHWestoN wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:45 pm To underscore one of your points, Comsa, Kitsune did give Joel the choice of returning to his human form and very enjoyable human life in the bargain. He turned that down without blinking an eye, choosing instead a dog's life with the only guarantee being that he'd always be with Bailey.![]()
Joel had to figure it out. Kitsune gave him a big hint, so it wasn't too hard to figure out which choice was which. Based on his reaction, he got the life he wanted to get. He was overjoyed that he got turned back into a dog and was with Bailey.Amazee Dayzee wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:03 pm I have always wondered if Joel knew which choice was which when Kitsune gave the objects to him. Kitsune didn't explain it so it was up to Joel to figure it out and he chose the life that he wanted.
Deliberately making someone's life miserable in order to force them to fight a holy war for him. And then when he wouldn't do it, taking his wife away from him and changing him back into a human when he knew that would cause nothing but trouble and put him at risk. Very decent.Cosmacelf wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 5:34 pm Pete was never evil. He was a pain in the butt, an annoying know-it-all and was resorting to desperate measures, but he stayed within the bounds of decency.
We first saw him trying to win over Grape via fun dreams. Gape was more than happy to be riding through the clouds on top of Pete. But Dragon interceded by, forcing I might remind you, Tarot to take a boyfriend she didn't even know. So in this skirmish, Pete's looking better than Dragon.
Then Joel is going to prison. And would have remained a bitter clueless person thereafter probably. Pete did actually do him a favor by turning him into a dog, even if Joel/King didn't appreciate it nor explicitly want it at the time. I'd be inclined to give Pete a pass here too.
OK, so next we have Pete trying to steal Joel/King's fate. To what end we don't know. However soon thereafter Pete is put on trial, gets punishment, and then can foresee that King's new girlfriend is going to play right into his hands. While King would have made a good Avatar due to age bonus, Bailey was tons better due to her natural athletic ability and the fact that she willingly did it for love of another, a big bonus. Pete just had to sit back and let things play out naturally after that. Pete just got lucky since King was going to run into Bailey at some point anyways, unless Pete somehow forced King to immediately fall in love with Bailey. Regardless, King/Bailey pairing up was in both their interests. So, again, I don't see much fault in what Pete did or didn't do here.
The only time that I remember that Pete was being unkind was soon after King turned into a dog and Pete was making King's life miserable. Pete was doing that to force King to submit to being his avatar, and as the heavenly judge wryly stated, he was getting pretty desperate at that point. It got taken out of Pete's hands at that point, King was sent to live with the wolves, etc.
What can I say? It's a fun topic to pick at. There's a whole cottage industry of people overexamining fictional characters in the world. X3Harry Johnathan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:18 am Me watching y’all debate the morality of a group of fictional characters literally called “The Nerds” in a webcomic about funny animal people:
By referring to the Bard as “Bill”, you have led me down a Wikipedia rabbit-hole, where I discovered that the Man from Avon spelt his name differently on every legal document he touched, and there were 3 movements in American academia trying to simplify the English language to match pronunciations (i.e, “of” becomes “ov” and “Association” as “Ashoshiashun”).
Thereby creating a cottage industry of argumentation over a number of his plays as to whether or or not he was the actual author. Equally banal aside, Theodore Roosevelt was a big advocate of spelling reform and phonetics. Hope you're well, too, Harry.Harry Johnathan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 3:07 pmBy referring to the Bard as “Bill”, you have led me down a Wikipedia rabbit-hole, where I discovered that the Man from Avon spelt his name differently on every legal document he touched, and there were 3 movements in American academia trying to simplify the English language to match pronunciations (i.e, “of” becomes “ov” and “Association” as “Ashoshiashun”).
King James? That King James?? Oooo...kay.Harry Johnathan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:55 pm The Shakespeare authorship conspiracy theories have always troubled me, it seems rather elitist and hateful to suggest that a middle-class average joe like The Bard couldn’t write such incredible plays, no, it “had” to have been nobility like Francis Bacon or King James (which is hilarious as academics and nobles looked down on plays during this time period the same way one might dismiss soap operas or comic book movies).
It's more of a "by their powers combined" situation
And the fact he's been fighting Kitsune for a while To use a boxing analogy, an evil Joe Louis has been fighting Floyd Paterson for ten rounds to get to the button that sets off the nukes. Just when he's finally winning - tired out but winning - Rocky Marciano and Christina Hammer arrive to back Paterson up.