![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
That means there are two foxes and two binos, fox doesn't show up till later, and Bino is at the podium.
^ This. This was my interpretation although it's not as fun as some of the fan theories you guys are concocting.Douglas Collier wrote:They could just be the same breed...
Haven't you realized by now? We thrive on extreme over-analysis of less than minor details!Hlaoroo wrote:^ This. This was my interpretation although it's not as fun as some of the fan theories you guys are concocting.Douglas Collier wrote:They could just be the same breed...
Like, there are small differences. The Bino in the audience doesn't have as much of a belly as the real Bino. And the Fox doesn't look as buff as the real Fox.
Have you been looking at the thing above this? Dis is my old signature and is not relevant anymore.Blog:
https://genstarblog.blogspot.com/
Da bad translations by Render:
http://www.housepetscomic.com/forums/vi ... 99#p772199
Long lost.Saturn381 wrote:Maybe it's his long lost brother, Dino.
I'd rather wait and find out.NoSoyFurry wrote:Do we seriously need Rick to say it's not a double or a time traveler or whatever?
Still the most likely explanation.Buster wrote:or is could just be a case of background clone syndrome. like inexplicably identical background ponies in MLP, extra deceptions being in multiple places at once in several of the transformers series, or that time there was a crowd in the background of a Simpsons episode with three Neilsons in it.
a common time-saving tactic for making background characters is to simplify and copy an existing character, and hope nobody notices.
I thought the fourth sibling was Fino.Xane wrote:It's obviously the fourth Bino/Fido/Joey sibling, Onib, and Fox's long-lost sister Xof.