Arc #63 Temple Crashers
- RandomGeekNamedBrent
- laughing maniacally
- Posts: 21032
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
nah, I was just joking. and can Pete even die? or would he just respawn back on the celestial plane?
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
He can be injured so I'm sure he could die, but I doubt dieing means the same thing to him as it would to mortals.RandomGeekNamedBrent wrote:nah, I was just joking. and can Pete even die? or would he just respawn back on the celestial plane?
- GarrisonSkunk
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:49 pm
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Dirk McQuigley?Sinder wrote:
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Ok so Rick says on his Twitter that the arc is going to be two pages longer then originally expected and that he "Made an unrelated arc pay off in this ending" Here and Here This should be very interesting I can't wait to see this ending now and what arc he made pay off.
Last edited by IceKitsune on Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
This should be a really good ending then. Freak us all out! I love it when a story arc does that!
UPDATE: So Karishad tell you that thing about foxes in the alt. text?
Poor Keene, always getting imprisoned somehow.
How is Keene going to capitalize on this?
UPDATE: So Karishad tell you that thing about foxes in the alt. text?
Poor Keene, always getting imprisoned somehow.
How is Keene going to capitalize on this?
- RootsofOrigin
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:41 am
- Location: The Spot (not Superdog)
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Oh I get it! Because it's a trap, right?
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Foxes don't have disasters. We are disasters.
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
So yeah she is there to basically keep them from knowing about the game; as well as alive, though considering Karishad could just wander around here I’m not exactly sure how useful that was.
- tychoaussie
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:00 pm
- Location: East lansing, MI
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
FWIW,
I am really *enjoying* this arc so a few extra pages doesnt bother me in the least!
I am really *enjoying* this arc so a few extra pages doesnt bother me in the least!
Fun-loving by birth, Honorable through upbringing, Brave by necessity.
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Apparantly, even a fox's luck of disaster cannot defeat the thief class's luck bonus.
That is, unless ferrets have a similar stat bonus of a hobbit, then we're talking about one lucky ferret.
That is, unless ferrets have a similar stat bonus of a hobbit, then we're talking about one lucky ferret.
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
- DanTwelve3
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:45 pm
- Location: Twin Cities
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
That wasn't a big waste of aaack. Quite the contrary, that was a very appropriate use of aaack.
2 strips longer than anticipated... does that mean ending this week, next week, or 2014?
2 strips longer than anticipated... does that mean ending this week, next week, or 2014?
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Time to fight the final boss
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Sparkles! Out of Frame! Awesome!!!
I like the night light rabbit's foot thing.
Oh no, A Sinister Shadow...
I like the night light rabbit's foot thing.
Oh no, A Sinister Shadow...
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
At first I thought it was Pete. Then I realized he doesn't talk that way.
Could it be Ethereal Manticore, who I will not shut up about until she's real?
Could it be Ethereal Manticore, who I will not shut up about until she's real?
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- RandomGeekNamedBrent
- laughing maniacally
- Posts: 21032
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Sleet, read the tags.
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Gah I did but I thought I didn't see his.
Yaknow Rick, those tags are kinda spoilers sometimes.
Yaknow Rick, those tags are kinda spoilers sometimes.
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- rickgriffin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
- Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I thought the black speech bubbles gave that away and you were jokingSleet wrote:Gah I did but I thought I didn't see his.
Yaknow Rick, those tags are kinda spoilers sometimes.
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Personally that was what gave it way from me though I thought it might be just like a huge statue of Pete and not Pete himself.rickgriffin wrote:I thought the black speech bubbles gave that away and you were jokingSleet wrote:Gah I did but I thought I didn't see his.
Yaknow Rick, those tags are kinda spoilers sometimes.
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Sleet does not joke about the Ethereal Manticore....
And I forgot to look at the tags and thought it was a minion of Pete's left there to guard the temple and such.
I also notice that none of those present are possible avatars for Pete, since Sabrina is allied with Dragon.
And I forgot to look at the tags and thought it was a minion of Pete's left there to guard the temple and such.
I also notice that none of those present are possible avatars for Pete, since Sabrina is allied with Dragon.
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Hey now, you never said Pete was the only one allowed to speak in black!rickgriffin wrote:I thought the black speech bubbles gave that away and you were jokingSleet wrote:Gah I did but I thought I didn't see his.
Yaknow Rick, those tags are kinda spoilers sometimes.
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
so finally Pete shown up. I wandering if Pete really have some type of interest in Keene or at least if he plan to use him somehow. At the end I think they gonna do some kind of deal, but who knows...
Now I'm thinking what if Sabrina is playing for both sides? Like a doble-agent? It's just a stupid theory but it could be really awesome! X3
Now I'm thinking what if Sabrina is playing for both sides? Like a doble-agent? It's just a stupid theory but it could be really awesome! X3
- Dissension
- Posts: 8840
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Nor did Rick explicitly say Pete was not the only one allowed to speak in that interesting way!Sleet wrote:Hey now, you never said Pete was the only one allowed to speak in black!
avatar: milodesty
people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
with all of this complaints I'm starting to wonder if I was the only one who noticed it was Pete who was talkin all along
- RandomGeekNamedBrent
- laughing maniacally
- Posts: 21032
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
no, I was pretty sure. I just checked the tags to be certain.
- Dissension
- Posts: 8840
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I made the same assumption.
avatar: milodesty
people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Gee, no wonder they found it so easily. Someone equipped is holding the lucky rabbit foot
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
- Radio Blue Heart
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:27 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Did Rick just make a dingo ate my baby joke?
"I have known hardship and learned to aid the wretched."
-Virgil
-Virgil
- rickgriffin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
- Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
The DINGO . . . ATE . . . ah-mah BABEHRadio Blue Heart wrote:Did Rick just make a dingo ate my baby joke?
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
o_o That's just NASTY!rickgriffin wrote:The DINGO . . . ATE . . . ah-mah BABEHRadio Blue Heart wrote:Did Rick just make a dingo ate my baby joke?
Cute reference =P
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I came to the forums to say one thing and one thing only: YAY PETE'S BACK!!!
....that's all, just felt like I had to get that out of my system...no theories or anything...unless you count the one about the King of the Cosmos being drinking buddies with Bahamut and Pete...
....that's all, just felt like I had to get that out of my system...no theories or anything...unless you count the one about the King of the Cosmos being drinking buddies with Bahamut and Pete...
And then God saw the havoc that humanity had wrought upon the earth, and he said unto them 'muffins and cookies kids, get off my lawn'
- RandomGeekNamedBrent
- laughing maniacally
- Posts: 21032
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
Karishad, I don't think Pete would taste very good... unless he tastes like Jerk chicken
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
So we finally learn what the goal of the first U&U game is, and its still stupid.
Edit: also so can Pete do what he promised or not? Trial in Heaven implied that he really couldn't and just made it up to get people to move the temple.
Edit: also so can Pete do what he promised or not? Trial in Heaven implied that he really couldn't and just made it up to get people to move the temple.
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I, for one, think it's a good plot. It's actually quite original, and i love originality
As far as it goes right now, he hasn't done it yet, but the conversation implies he can definitely do it.
As far as it goes right now, he hasn't done it yet, but the conversation implies he can definitely do it.
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
So is Karishad like a prestige class?
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
See the one thing that confuses me is in Trial in Heaven Pete implied that it was something he couldn’t actually do. (and in fact that it was something he made up on the spot to get someone to move the temple) Now here him and Sabrina are saying this was the reason the first U&U game was being played, and why Dragon and Pete disagreed and had to do this whole duel thing. So which is it?
Also to clarify, the reason I find it stupid is because what gives Pete or Dragon the right to try and do this to the world at all? (either way they want to do it)
Also to clarify, the reason I find it stupid is because what gives Pete or Dragon the right to try and do this to the world at all? (either way they want to do it)
- RandomGeekNamedBrent
- laughing maniacally
- Posts: 21032
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm
- Location: an invisible, flying volcano over Virginia
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I don't see where you're seeing that this is the purpose of the first U&U game. I see that it is the subject of a bet, which may or may not be separate from the game itself. Or possibly that the bet is the game, but giving up all his power to do this thing would make him lose the game.
Last edited by RandomGeekNamedBrent on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
That's kind of a perk of being a demi-god, you don't really have to explain yourself. Pete wouldn't make a very good villain if he had some selfless reason for what he was doing now would he?IceKitsune wrote:
Also to clarify, the reason I find it stupid is because what gives Pete or Dragon the right to try and do this to the world at all? (either way they want to do it)
I think in Non-sequiturs
"I told you not to put metal in the science oven! What'd you do that for?"
Trash boiz
"I told you not to put metal in the science oven! What'd you do that for?"
Trash boiz
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
IceKitsune wrote:See the one thing that confuses me is in Trial in Heaven Pete implied that it was something he couldn’t actually do. (and in fact that it was something he made up on the spot to get someone to move the temple) Now here him and Sabrina are saying this was the reason the first U&U game was being played, and why Dragon and Pete disagreed and had to do this whole duel thing. So which is it?
Also to clarify, the reason I find it stupid is because what gives Pete or Dragon the right to try and do this to the world at all? (either way they want to do it)
What gives man the right to put ants in a glass case filled with dirt for the rest of their lives? Or would you prefer the example of a older wiser sister/brother trying to decide the best way to raise their younger siblings?
But since we're dealing with Divine beings, I'd say the ant is the more correct analogy...
And then God saw the havoc that humanity had wrought upon the earth, and he said unto them 'muffins and cookies kids, get off my lawn'
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc #63 Temple Crashers
I would actually say that the more correct analogy would be what right would a bunch of aliens with advance technology have to mess with earth. They didn't create the universe (as stated in the comic and by Rick) so I really don't care if they are Divine beings that doesn't give them the right to do this.Ratros wrote:IceKitsune wrote:See the one thing that confuses me is in Trial in Heaven Pete implied that it was something he couldn’t actually do. (and in fact that it was something he made up on the spot to get someone to move the temple) Now here him and Sabrina are saying this was the reason the first U&U game was being played, and why Dragon and Pete disagreed and had to do this whole duel thing. So which is it?
Also to clarify, the reason I find it stupid is because what gives Pete or Dragon the right to try and do this to the world at all? (either way they want to do it)
What gives man the right to put ants in a glass case filled with dirt for the rest of their lives? Or would you prefer the example of a older wiser sister/brother trying to decide the best way to raise their younger siblings?
But since we're dealing with Divine beings, I'd say the ant is the more correct analogy...