Housepets!

Chat Thread Rules
1. Follow the Forum Rules
2. The Chat Thread thread can cover any topic allowed on this forum, but do not allow things with existing threads to take over the thread. This includes role playing.
3. The Chat Thread isn't the IRC; it's still in the forum format. Don't make posts that consist entirely of greetings, goodbyes, or acknowledgement of how people aren't posting at the moment.

now we were discussing Google Gravity. continue.
or change the topic your choice. but Google gravity is pretty awesome.

I get way too much amusement out of Google variants. There was a time I'd almost exclusively use Elgoog.

Also, one of these days I'll be the thread starter.

Okay, just figured out what it was and freaked for a moment when the sky was falling. Anyway, fun, entertaining, but I think I'll just use Google, the normal kind.

What's the big deal with web browsers? I just use one and live it, that's it.

Same here, don't see the big fuss so long as it ain't Internet Explorer. It had a few holes in its scripts.

RancidRabbit wrote:Same here, don't see the big fuss so long as it ain't Internet Explorer. It had a few holes in its scripts.

But...

I use internet explorer...

People are always looking for a reason to be superior to everyone else. So they whine about web browsers.

Not to say everyone with an opinion is like that. Just that people like that exist and that's why it's treated as a big deal.

Sorry, Kalloon.....it, uh, just didn't work for me, ya'know.

I could see that, Sleet. It may have just been my IE that had a hole due to some download issue at the factory or something. Was a shared computer so never really ran well.

I still honestly don't care which one is superior, just as long as the thing gets the job done. It's the same for everything

Psyke, I don't think anyone would want to use the parodies if they don't work.... Unless just to see what happens

TensaZangetsu wrote:Psyke, I don't think anyone would want to use the parodies if they don't work.... Unless just to see what happens

Thank you, Tensa. I was worried that was unclear.
The point of doing that would be to make fun of other search engines. As in it would be a joke. As in the purpose would be to entertain, not find out if elephants can jump or when Jack Holmes was born.

Psykeout wrote:

TensaZangetsu wrote:Psyke, I don't think anyone would want to use the parodies if they don't work.... Unless just to see what happens

Thank you, Tensa. I was worried that was unclear.
The point of doing that would be to make fun of other search engines. As in it would be a joke. As in the purpose would be to entertain, not find out if elephants can jump or when Jack Holmes was born.

I'm not sure if the first part of that was sarcasm or not...

he didn't use up tacks, so I assume he was serious.

RandomGeekNamedBrent wrote:he didn't use up tacks, so I assume he was serious.

Upside down tacks

Pending other mod approval, you sir have named the next thread.

Ebly wrote:Between XXX and 34, this decade of chat threads is really turning out interesting.

I'm holding out for 35: If it doesn't exist, then it will be made.

Appropriately enough, it doesn't exist. And it will be made.

I can only imagine what would go into 35....which makes perfect sense *ponders this thought some more*

Sleet wrote:

Ebly wrote:Between XXX and 34, this decade of chat threads is really turning out interesting.

I'm holding out for 35: If it doesn't exist, then it will be made.

Appropriately enough, it doesn't exist. And it will be made.

maybe you'll get to be the one to make it.

Psykeout wrote:Gossip thread 63.

Oh yes please this.

I wonder if anyone will even remember

Psykeout had to explain that one to me. I feel ashamed.

should I feel ashamed that I don't understand?

I know I shouldn't, so explain away, please!

... I feel mixed feeling towards that and not sure...

So gossip is the female version of chat?
Women can chat and guys can gossip. therefore, the chat thread is already androgynous enough that rule 63 does not apply. at least according to Urban Dictionary.

Oh, right....that rule 63........*Facepalm*
In other news, my itunes converter has been running for five hours now....this is much slower than Zune. (Note: Owns the equivalent music library of a radio-station)

RandomGeekNamedBrent wrote:So gossip is the female version of chat?
Women can chat and guys can gossip. therefore, the chat thread is already androgynous enough that rule 63 does not apply.

yes, but you still get the joke.

Random aside, but has anyone noticed that just about the only posts in the past day and a half in the Internet Censorship thread have been from the mods?

I would have posted something about it here, but a) it would probably be considered off-topic, and b) that would break the chain. =P

better find a coin to flip then

Psykeout wrote:Well we have so many mods that at any given time there's a 50% chance that you are a mod.

Whenever I see a post that breaks the rules, I flip a coin. If it's heads, I deal with it. If it's tails, I report it and let someone else.

I flip a coin too. if it's heads, I let Sleet flip a coin. if it's tails, I flip a coin.