John-056 wrote:Okay, 1: The reason I say that the real Sasha would call Fox 'Foxy-bon' regardless of rank or Job is because Sasha uses affectionate nicknames for anyone she truly considers a friend, even in the non-romantic sense. She Considers Fox a friend, so she would have called him Foxy-Bon upon seeing him. However, she called him 'Officer', a more neutral term, which is something she NEVER uses for friends.
Behavioural Quirk.
John-056 wrote:2. This Version of 'Sasha' here could have been owned by somebody else who actually wants to see pets as nothing more than dumb animals... Or, she could be a Sibling of Sasha who's likely gotten the short-er end of the stick compared to Sasha... Or this is just a similar looking dog to Sasha, a possible sibling of her's, who was ordered to kill Keene Milton and frame Sasha. Mini-Human in a Dog-suit was a throwaway quote used by Bailey when she was annoyed at King.
Meaning it's either ... 1 just Sasha ... 2 someone who is, for all intents and purposes, completely interchangeable with Sasha ... Or 3 anything in between options 1 and 2.
John-056 wrote:3. That is a VERY old comic around Art Shift 2.0, prior to Art Shift 3.0. Artshift 3.0 was described by Rick to give the Cast a more unique appearance and apparel to differentiate them better. Did you even check Rick's websites? He put up three character sheets, each being of Sasha, Fox and King, showing off their new appearances, breeds, What Paw they use most often and notable physical traits.
Yeah, about that ...
John-056 wrote:4. Altered? Easily Malleable? Sasha is a complex character. She's not a complete Air-Head (Most Notable when Bino tried regifting her for Valentine's Day), she's talented at the Piano, And she has a Frightening Rage Face. And you have the idea that, 'Oh, she's an Air-Head, so it'll be easy to destroy her personality and make her into a killer!' NO. That's not how it works. If you destroy someone's Psyche, then what is left? An Empty shell, that's what. Also, last I checked, breaking one's Psyche does NOT make a Body Mark disappear. Rick even States that it's NOT a Cutie mark, so it won't disappear when her Psyche is broken.
Right, so what you are telling me, then, is that I am fully justified in questioning her psychological stability on the basis of her extreme emotional vicissitude and disturbingly agressive treatment of someone she ostensibly cares for. I agree entirely.
John-056 wrote:Sasha may have been Stepford Smiling for yonks, but if Daisy, a fellow Stepford Smiler, notices something wrong, then there IS something wrong... And it all started with the Obedience Training. Either it's brainwashed her, or that other Sasha is a Poorly made clone, a Doppleganger or another female dog pretending to be Sasha.
Exactly. I think we can be fairly certain that it is, or is very similar to, one of those four scenarios. So we're all on the same page now, right?
John-056 wrote:That may be so, yet last I checked, Sasha HAS been coping, via helping the Forest animals anyway she can. Why do you think they've gone as far as to call her the Traveller?
Because "legends sound cooler when they're vague and spooky". Also, this discussion aside, I don't recall any mention of her helping any of them with anything.
John-056 wrote:Also, did you not read what I wrote? I also pointed out Sasha's missing Mark, her missing Bangles, Not recognizing Fox and calling him Officer rather than Foxy-Bon... Too many inconsistencies from Sasha to not be a fake. You can break a person, but you can't rewrite everything about them. Behavior traits don't just disappear! If Sasha HAD Snapped, she would have called Fox "Foxy-Bon" rather than officer.
See, now you're just backtracking on the same assumptions. Marks can be drawn, bangles can be removed, forms of address can be interchanged. These aren't inconsistencies; they're just cosmetic devices that we could reasonably expect to be discarded under the present circumstances.
John-056 wrote:I have no idea why so many people are jumping to the conclusion that "Sasha Did It." It's too easy and it feels like this Canid is trying too Hard to act like Sasha without the soul or personality. As a matter of fact, why are you also agreeing with Sasha being a murderer? Why do so many people want to think that Sasha's a murderer and passing it off as 'Snapping from stress'. That's not entirely how it works.
And just how many beople have come to that particular conclusion? From what I've seen, most of the unfounded assumptions are coming from you. Even the pink husky conspiracy theorists made it fairly clear they were suggesting it as
a possibility.
John-056 wrote:To snap and become a murderer would mean that the Targeted person had to wrong them in someway and that the Murderer would have to bear a grudge.
I'm sorry, what murder? She claims to have vandalized the underside of a car. That's it.