Buckdida wrote:
So, eventually, when the forum's database gets too large and begins to slow down, large and locked threads are the FIRST things to eat dirt.
When that day comes I assure you that some post counts will drop by more than half leaving post count largely irrelevant!
You mean your post count is directly tied to the existence of the threads you posted on?
That's deliciously EVIL!
Yeah, I'm still not a fan of that feature on any forum I participate in.
As you say, quality over quantity.
- Esquire Fox
What do you mean that's not what the signature is for?
You all should. Every single member I know on this forum isn't sleeping enough. Sleep is healthy, you know. And lots of sleep is good for a good start of a new day.
Richarson Valley Edward S4 P8 E6 C8 I9 A3 L5 Shanks S7 P5 E6 C7 I4 A6 L7
Well, my time of sleep just depends. Mostly I rest at weekends, but only when I'm in my little house in mountains. The climate there just recharges me.
But since I'm studying, sometimes I have to sit at night so I can be prepared for lessons, exams or showing my photos. So I have to sacrifice some sleep for school, but sometimes I wish to sleep longer...
Sleet wrote:I'm still in the four digits no matter how many chat threads get deleted, so I'm cool. As long as I don't look like these scrubs over here with their less-than-four-digit post counts.
Sleet wrote:I'm still in the four digits no matter how many chat threads get deleted, so I'm cool. As long as I don't look like these scrubs over here with their less-than-four-digit post counts.
the epitome of sensitivity.
It was a rhetorical question. It just so happens the answer was "no." But what if it wasn't. Huh?
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
Sleet wrote:I'm still in the four digits no matter how many chat threads get deleted, so I'm cool. As long as I don't look like these scrubs over here with their less-than-four-digit post counts.
the epitome of sensitivity.
It was a rhetorical question. It just so happens the answer was "no." But what if it wasn't. Huh?
how is that a rhetorical question?
Last edited by Psykeout on Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anyway, today's gone pretty nicely. No escalations, only a couple of claims, answering lots of questions and registering products...
...
...I say that with a partial expectation that I'll spend the rest of the night doing "hard" (how hard does call-taking get) stuff and/or getting yelled at by customers.
avatar: milodesty
people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
It was rhetorical in the sense that I wasn't actually looking for an answer to "maybe I'm sensitive?"
Dissension wrote:That's not the weirdest pairing.
The particularly weird potential pairings don't show up because I don't want Rick to murder me over squicky randomized ships. So things like Zach and Grape are what we have to work with instead.
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
