Title Text: If she's having trouble, my mother knows some good fertility treatments
Why am I not at all surprised to find Rex here?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I think Rex is a mastiff, since a bulldog would be much shorter. But I don't really know.Douglas Collier wrote:So is Rex a bulldog or a mastiff?
So, what was your surname for him? I forget.valerio wrote:Rex Holloway. Cute.
Also, stylistic-wise, I must admit I am happy to see him without that goatee.
Ising, and his dad is supposed to be a doctor in my ficcie. But at this point, there are way too many differences to correct them, unless I do a reboot, and that would be a real killer, so I'll leave as it is what I put at that time.SuperStar wrote:So, what was your surname for him? I forget.valerio wrote:Rex Holloway. Cute.
Also, stylistic-wise, I must admit I am happy to see him without that goatee.
I do wonder how toddler/older pet dog relationships work in Housepets!Mickey wrote:Yay! I've always liked minor characters like Rex. He's looks intimidating, but he's soft enough to use as a pillow. (And now I have a story idea. That wasn't supposed to happen)
I hope Rex gets a little sister!
He could be a Bullmastiff. Those are freakishly tall.Miles the Wolf wrote:I think Rex is a mastiff, since a bulldog would be much shorter. But I don't really know.Douglas Collier wrote:So is Rex a bulldog or a mastiff?
Never said they weren't, in fact that's exactly what I thought. Did I miss word something somewhere that I missed?Kitch wrote: And Star, the Holloways are a couple. The owner for Rex at the end of "Housepets! Christmas" is a guy.
Good luck with that, Housepets! has so many characters it's really hard to remember them all. Although the cast and their characterzation is one of the strongest point of this comicdtlux1 wrote:Ha, I forgot about Rex, great to see him again. Great name too, Rex Holloway.
I bet all of those diapers will be used up in no time, I am not changing them though. Wonder how much she got.
I really need to reread the comic so I stop forgetting characters.
But she's already with Miles.HundKatzeMaus wrote:I hope we'll learn a lot about Lucretia and Rex and how the chemistry between the two will be
Judging by Rex's response, probably not enough.dtlux1 wrote:I bet all of those diapers will be used up in no time, I am not changing them though. Wonder how much she got.
At the very least he's been around human babies for a long enough period of time to know about their diapering needs.Kitch wrote:Judging by Rex's response to the diaper thing, I have a feeling the Holloways already have at least one human child.
no, not that kind of chemistry, I mean how they act and talk to each other in a casual way. I didn't even thought one second about shipping or somethingDouglas Collier wrote:But she's already with Miles.HundKatzeMaus wrote:I hope we'll learn a lot about Lucretia and Rex and how the chemistry between the two will be
Possibly, but the first thing that hit me is that Lucertia doesn't realize how long and often human children have to change diapers as opposed to what she saw on television. If she bought them for the child's whole lifetime... i'm guessing she bought like ten bags of them. =PKitch wrote:Judging by Rex's response to the diaper thing, I have a feeling the Holloways already have at least one human child.
My guess would be how many times they change on tv, as her pups grew up in the wild, which means they would need no diapers.GameCobra wrote:Possibly, but the first thing that hit me is that Lucertia doesn't realize how long and often human children have to change diapers as opposed to what she saw on television. If she bought them for the child's whole lifetime... i'm guessing she bought like ten bags of them. =PKitch wrote:Judging by Rex's response to the diaper thing, I have a feeling the Holloways already have at least one human child.
I also wonder if her thought process was "How many diapers would my pups need?" or "How many times did they change diapers on Television?"
Hosting a human baby shower though would have her think of her own children as humans at one point, i'm sure.dtlux1 wrote:My guess would be how many times they change on tv, as her pups grew up in the wild, which means they would need no diapers.
Why? Did they eat something in the forest that made potty breaks unnecesary or something? : Pdtlux1 wrote:My guess would be how many times they change on tv, as her pups grew up in the wild, which means they would need no diapers.
Silly Zealot wrote: Why? Did they eat something in the forest that made potty breaks unnecesary or something? : P
Archie the Bear wrote: It makes a cork in my butt?!
No, it's more like that in the forest it doesn't as much matter where said potty breaks occur, so diapers probably aren't needed.Silly Zealot wrote:Why? Did they eat something in the forest that made potty breaks unnecesary or something? : Pdtlux1 wrote:My guess would be how many times they change on tv, as her pups grew up in the wild, which means they would need no diapers.
Well, that's a pretty obvious rule to follow, but in the forest there is plenty of room.Amazee Dayzee wrote:I hope they at least did their business away from the areas that they slept.