Sleet wrote:Well I think that's bad. The animals should be killed as painlessly as is feasible. I don't mean they have to go all the way and do a potassium chloride injection (which would ruin the meat anyway), but bludgeoning them to death is not the best way.
Well, I agree but in their defense:
They can't actually go for the most painless kill as it:
1) Time-Intensive
2) More humane methods involves money
a) Which they are short on as they have to sell it at regulated prices.
b) Which they can't afford as they have their families to look after as well.
c) Which is not something they are willing to spend for if it doesn't grant them additional benefits. (General human nature)
3) Risky
a) Some people are especially cautious on how their meat was "made".
b) There are plenty of saboteurs that could (and would) make-up semi-credible stories.
c) What evidence proves that this in an infallible method?
4) It has the same end result.
Not that I am for these reasons, I just prefer that the conversation does not end up one-sided.
@SomebodyYouKnow
I think what I'm saying is, I'm typing against my better conscience. It's not that I agree to such practices, I'm just pointing out that there are different sides for every story told.
What do you mean "watch my words"? It's my tongue that I sharpened.