Members vs Mods 3: Keep The Fire Burning

Post by **Render** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:55 am

I kn0w, the score isn't ending on 0 at the moment (

), but...

---

Hlaoroo had the idea that (for the mods only!) instead of resetting the score to 0 we half the member's score only (rounding up). Just until 10 or below then we go to 0 directly to skip the bits and bobs at the end.

Examples:
126 / 63 / 32 / 16 / 8 / 0 / -20 / -40
211 / 106 / 53 / 27 / 14 / 7 / 0 / -20 / -40

With members in between:
211 / 106 / 108 / 110 / 55 / 28 / 30 / 32 / 34 / 36 / 38 / 40 / 20 / 10 / 0 / -20 / -40

While it is on Member's side still:
-120 / -140 / -160 / -180 / 0 / 2 / 4

What do you think? Would that make the game more fair and fun to play?
(the rest of the rules will remain untouched presently)

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:06 am

Post by **Render** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:33 pm

Douglas Collier wrote:5

You mean 2 because in this game we still have the same rules and this goes back to 0.
But I take your answer as "Yes, I like that."

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 1:41 pm

I'm confused. Half of our score - 6 - would have been 3, and I added two to that to get 5. So, do you reset at zero or half the score, as you said?

Post by **Render** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:10 pm

Halving the score is an idea for the next round...

0

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:13 pm

2

Maybe round up to the nearest even number?

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:32 pm

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:46 pm

Post by **Render** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:56 pm

Douglas Collier wrote:Maybe round up to the nearest even number?

What's wrong with uneven numbers? When you lead, you only add +1...

0

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:06 pm

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:09 pm

5
I guess you're right!

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:04 pm

ArcFlight · Post by **ArcFlight** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:43 pm

CHAOKOCartoons · Post by **CHAOKOCartoons** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:45 pm

ArcFlight · Post by **ArcFlight** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:46 pm

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:08 pm

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:33 pm

Douglas Collier · Post by **Douglas Collier** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:37 pm

SergeiTheFox · Post by **SergeiTheFox** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:31 am

ArcFlight · Post by **ArcFlight** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:51 am

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:58 am

SergeiTheFox · Post by **SergeiTheFox** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:39 am

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 4:38 am

Post by **Render** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:59 am

0

---

What do you others think about this?

Render wrote:Hlaoroo had the idea that (for the mods only!) instead of resetting the score to 0 we half the member's score only (rounding up). Just until 10 or below then we go to 0 directly to skip the bits and bobs at the end.

Examples:
126 / 63 / 32 / 16 / 8 / 0 / -20 / -40
211 / 106 / 53 / 27 / 14 / 7 / 0 / -20 / -40

With members in between:
211 / 106 / 108 / 110 / 55 / 28 / 30 / 32 / 34 / 36 / 38 / 40 / 20 / 10 / 0 / -20 / -40

While it is on Member's side still:
-120 / -140 / -160 / -180 / 0 / 2 / 4

What do you think? Would that make the game more fair and fun to play?
(the rest of the rules will remain untouched presently)

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 4:40 pm

SergeiTheFox · Post by **SergeiTheFox** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:45 pm

4

Render wrote:What do you others think about this?

*Idea and stuff*

I like it; it does seem that it would make the game more fun.

Saturn381 · Post by **Saturn381** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:11 pm