Housepets!

SuperStar wrote:

Game Cobra wrote:Steve

Welsh Halfwit wrote:Steve

Amazee Dayzee wrote:Steve

D-Rock wrote:Steve

HERE THE VOICE OF STEVE! Praise Steve! The true Opener of Ways!

All hail Steve! I know that Zach will because he is no longer the Opener! He won't have to deal with animals bowing down to him! The TRUE Opener!

Amazee Dayzee wrote:All hail Steve! I know that Zach will because he is no longer the Opener! He won't have to deal with animals bowing down to him! The TRUE Opener!

Actually I think the guys who were saying steve meant that old commercial for "hump day" Wait a minute, how does Steve open things?!!! He has no opposable thumbs!, or fingers for that matter.

Amazee Dayzee wrote:I still want him to have three daughters. I wanna see how he deals with daughters.

Whats the problem with daughters?

Mod Edit: Please do not double post. If you need to add new information to a thread and yours is the most recent comment, you may use the edit button in its upper-right corner.

Dissension wrote:They're talking about Delusional Steve, not Steve?, so let's stick to discussing the comic here.

Oh yeah, i love that guy! He was the one that was in housepets babies and was...well...delusional I guess. Whoops just double posted again, sorry Dissension. Is housepets in any newspapers? Probably not because newspapers limit comics to one regular strip and this commonly includes double strips

There is NO problems with daughters. I want to see how King would deal with having them as opposed to sons.

Amazee Dayzee wrote:There is NO problems with daughters. I want to see how King would deal with having them as opposed to sons.

But whats the difference. My family only had guys all my life and they can't be better than daughters. Can they? I don't mean worse like an insult just like more of a handful, i'm not trying to disrespect anyone. Hey. I just realized, there have been no puppys in housepets! I mean there are Milo's kids, but they were born before he was in the comic, plus the're wolves. But they shouldn't be Pete and the dragon, because that would be lopsided with 1 normal sibling, it would be like; "Pete, stop threatening your brother with a thousand dimensions of death!" :lol:Oh yeah, and your fanfic name just says: epic fantasy, you should write a novel called that. Since chat is down on todays comic we might as well discuss it here. I know King is worried, but playing a racing game is not dangerous. However it does make Bailey way too enthusiastic.

Because I was thinking that King would be an overprotective father or he might end up with daughters strong enough to body slam him.

Amazee Dayzee wrote:Because I was thinking that King would be an overprotective father or he might end up with daughters strong enough to body slam him.

Well, if they were able body slam him, they would probably be much older than puppys, unless you mean all at once? Because even though they will be 1/2 Bailey's puppys, they'll still be half king's. And thats still really short.
Actually, everyone close to King has tackled him at one time or another. Which is actually kinda strange when I think about it. :/

But I want to see King with three daughters.

Amazee Dayzee wrote:But I want to see King with three daughters.

Why not two daughters and one son?

Because having three daughters and no sons will drive him crazy in a good way. xP

Is it possible to be crazy in a good way. Scratch that, Delusional Steve is crazy, if he wasn't crazy he would probably be crying in a corner thinking about how those jerky owners left him there. I would feel sorry for him but he has that cool eye-patch.

If we're in the middle of "Year Thirteen or so", why isn't this thread "Locked". Ain't been Year Seven for a while - or am I being unsentimental?

Usually topics about the end of the year of the comic are kept unlocked. Speaking of locking topics though, I can't remember the last time one WAS locked.

Typically threads are only locked if problems arise. Though reviving a thread without sticking to one of the topics brought up in said thread might do the same.

Well he did stick to the thread when he revived the topic so there is no problem there. Even if his sense of comedy isn't good. LOL

Well, that all seems pretty reasonable .......

The only thing that isn't unreasonable I would have to say is you trying (and failing) to be funny with your previous post. XD

…no need to hit below the belt like that, Dayzee.

... I don't think this is going to go anywhere now so

[THREAD LOCKED]