One-Offs: Set #12

For old comic discussions threads! seriously what did you think
User avatar
Dissension
Posts: 8840
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dissension »

An Awesome Company.
avatar: milodesty

people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
User avatar
GameCobra
Posts: 7243
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:27 am
Location: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by GameCobra »

Dissension wrote:An Awesome Company.
Even better than Marvel.
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
Image
User avatar
Dissension
Posts: 8840
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dissension »

Oh, definitely! Could call it "Bad Wolf Comics," perhaps.
avatar: milodesty

people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
User avatar
GameCobra
Posts: 7243
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:27 am
Location: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by GameCobra »

Peanut: Too Dark!
Joey: The Shining Light Wolf Pack?
Peanut: Meh. Needs more seriousness.
Cubs: Death and Destruction!
Peanut: ;_;
3 words - Liquid Metal Fur
Image
User avatar
Kyderra
Posts: 2725
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:31 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Kyderra »

I would read it.
"Why would you ever want to connect the dots?"
User avatar
Liam
Posts: 1794
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:25 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Liam »

Dissension wrote:Oh, definitely! Could call it "Bad Wolf Comics," perhaps.
And then some years later Rob Deathaxe leaves the company together with other like-minds to form "Picture Comics".

Their first creator-owned series teams up DethAXE with BLOODRIFLE. First they search for BLOODRIFLE'S mighty BLOOD RIFLE, but then they must save the WHOLE WORLD from their greatest enemy - the leader of the Republican Party, Satan McHitler-bin Ladin!

**** YEAH!!!
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
Wanderer wrote:You don't need a job, you need money.
User avatar
Sinder
Posts: 1737
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:48 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Sinder »

peanut doesn't draw a whole lot better than he does
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
Sleet
Bringing Foxy Back
Posts: 17291
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
Location: Nephelokokkygia
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Sleet »

I bet drawing this one presented a bit of a challenge, since it was necessary to have a comic drawn visibly worse than Spot (superdog) is.
Image
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
User avatar
Barkeron
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Barkeron »

Well compared with the cubs drawing, it makes Peanut's comics look professional (in a sense). But this is a cool comic strip.
User avatar
44R0NM10
Former Mod of the Aura
Posts: 4011
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by 44R0NM10 »

Awesome strip, next issue we have a guest hero by the name of Superdog! I can see it now!

DETHAXE VS SUPERDOG!
Dr. Prower
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 10:29 pm
Location: Here, Back and Better Than Ever!
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dr. Prower »

Barkeron wrote:Well compared with the cubs drawing, it makes Peanut's comics look professional (in a sense).
I agree 100 percent on this. I thought Peanut was bad at drawing, but the cubs...wow...
I ship Grape&Peanut and support King&Bailey
Image
User avatar
IceKitsune
Posts: 5111
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by IceKitsune »

Dr. Prower wrote:
Barkeron wrote:Well compared with the cubs drawing, it makes Peanut's comics look professional (in a sense).
I agree 100 percent on this. I thought Peanut was bad at drawing, but the cubs...wow...
Well the cubs are also much younger then Peanut and haven't been drawing as long.

Edit: fixed wording
Dr. Prower
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 10:29 pm
Location: Here, Back and Better Than Ever!
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dr. Prower »

IceKitsune wrote:
Dr. Prower wrote:
Barkeron wrote:Well compared with the cubs drawing, it makes Peanut's comics look professional (in a sense).
I agree 100 percent on this. I thought Peanut was bad at drawing, but the cubs...wow...
Well the cubs are also much younger then Peanut and haven't been drawing as long.

Edit: fixed wording
True. After all, my very early works looked similar to that lol.
I ship Grape&Peanut and support King&Bailey
Image
User avatar
Foldo
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: European Union
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Foldo »

+1 with Dr. Prower.
Everyone hasn't Rick's talent. *sigh*
User avatar
Typhon
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In my house. Reading housepets. And organic chemistry.

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Typhon »

My spanish teacher verbally berates you if you draw bad. She shows your drawing in front of the whole class, asks everyone to look, and then proceeds to tell everyone on how sucky you are. Its very good for your moral. Why are we even drawing pictures? this isn't even kindergarden...

But yeah. The cub's drawing is kinda what she thinks every looks like.
ReCreate
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: http://bordomirc.co.cc
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by ReCreate »

Art class? i hated that class
Last edited by ReCreate on Wed May 26, 2010 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't let others define you, Only you can determine your fate
no longer active, sorry
User avatar
Barkeron
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Barkeron »

Dr. Prower wrote:
Barkeron wrote:Well compared with the cubs drawing, it makes Peanut's comics look professional (in a sense).
I agree 100 percent on this. I thought Peanut was bad at drawing, but the cubs...wow...
I just like the fact that Peanut is giving the cub (DethAxe) some pointers on the comic, such as putting some more feeling into it and adding more stuff to it. (I know DethAxe is not the cub official name, but i though I just use it anyways).
User avatar
metaecho
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:09 am
Location: Fonduistan

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by metaecho »

(I know DethAxe is not the cub official name, but i though I just use it anyways).
are you denying there naming abilites?
anyway, I wonder what mean humans come to there front door...
HELLO THERE
Image
User avatar
Sleet
Bringing Foxy Back
Posts: 17291
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
Location: Nephelokokkygia
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Sleet »

IceKitsune wrote:Well the cubs are also much younger then Peanut and haven't been drawing as long.
They're also wolves. :3
Image
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
User avatar
Liam
Posts: 1794
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:25 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Liam »

Image
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
Wanderer wrote:You don't need a job, you need money.
User avatar
Barkeron
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Barkeron »

metaecho wrote:
(I know DethAxe is not the cub official name, but i though I just use it anyways).
are you denying there naming abilites?
No. What I saying I'm saying is that, I have yet to learn of the cub's real name.
Dr. Prower
Posts: 1446
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 10:29 pm
Location: Here, Back and Better Than Ever!
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dr. Prower »

Barkeron wrote:
metaecho wrote:
(I know DethAxe is not the cub official name, but i though I just use it anyways).
are you denying there naming abilites?
No. What I saying I'm saying is that, I have yet to learn of the cub's real name.
Because the cub has no real name.
I ship Grape&Peanut and support King&Bailey
Image
User avatar
Alex
Posts: 3792
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:41 pm
Location: End of Time
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Alex »

Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
Richarson Valley
Edward S4 P8 E6 C8 I9 A3 L5
Shanks S7 P5 E6 C7 I4 A6 L7


Image
User avatar
Kyderra
Posts: 2725
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:31 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Kyderra »

Alex wrote:Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
thats not real blood, its drawn blood... in the comic ... erm
i dont know
"Why would you ever want to connect the dots?"
User avatar
Zander
Posts: 3640
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:02 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Zander »

Kyderra wrote:
Alex wrote:Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
thats not real blood, its drawn blood... in the comic ... erm
i dont know
in "Housepets!" the comic it would be, but there is no rating on the cubs comic! (Hooray for loopholes! >:D)
Image
Image
Image
Fursona! :3

Don't judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds that you plant.
-Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
Typhon
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In my house. Reading housepets. And organic chemistry.

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Typhon »

Zander wrote:
Kyderra wrote:
Alex wrote:Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
thats not real blood, its drawn blood... in the comic ... erm
i dont know
in "Housepets!" the comic it would be, but there is no rating on the cubs comic! (Hooray for loopholes! >:D)
The logic Nazi in me want to point out that technically if housepets comic=a and cub's comic=b then it would be a(b) which simplifies to ab which means their product is part of both of them making the rating distributed to all. But who cares.
User avatar
metaecho
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:09 am
Location: Fonduistan

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by metaecho »

...technically if housepets comic=a and cub's comic=b then it would be a(b) which simplifies to ab...
My grammer Nazi would like you to explain.
HELLO THERE
Image
User avatar
Foldo
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: European Union
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Foldo »

And I thought there would never be a Godwin point right here.
Last edited by Foldo on Thu May 27, 2010 7:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
metaecho
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:09 am
Location: Fonduistan

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by metaecho »

bound to happen sometime or another... and Im guessing we should stray away from nazis. Plus I think I've figured it out.
HELLO THERE
Image
ReCreate
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: http://bordomirc.co.cc
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by ReCreate »

metaecho wrote:
...technically if housepets comic=a and cub's comic=b then it would be a(b) which simplifies to ab...
My grammer Nazi would like you to explain.
It's a subcomic. A comic within the comic. Thus it counts as the comic.
Don't let others define you, Only you can determine your fate
no longer active, sorry
User avatar
metaecho
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:09 am
Location: Fonduistan

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by metaecho »

and another fast reply by our wonderfull fourum team...
HELLO THERE
Image
User avatar
Dissension
Posts: 8840
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Dissension »

Hmm? Wha?
avatar: milodesty

people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
User avatar
Teh Brawler
Posts: 5133
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:26 pm
Location: Someplace with Internet access
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Teh Brawler »

The reason I believe that the "blood" doesn't break PG is because it's fabricated, and is only implying violence from the perspective of a child, kind of like how superheroes wail on villians, but aren't considered violent. That and it's very poorly drawn.
DOH HO HO WELL THEN
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by rickgriffin »

Alex wrote:Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
I think I had Joel bleeding some last year

Anyway, it's fake poorly drawn blood. You'd have to convince me that it would qualify as PG-13
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
User avatar
Esquire Fox
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:48 pm
Location: Bork, Bork, Bork! (Sweden)

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Esquire Fox »

I don't think that anyone who regularly comments is under 13 anyways.
Best not to think too hard on it. Trying to think of reasons someone else might be shocked or offended when you are not is a bit loony.
We'll leave that to the MPAA and ESRB =P.
- Esquire Fox

What do you mean that's not what the signature is for?
User avatar
Typhon
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In my house. Reading housepets. And organic chemistry.

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Typhon »

Most of the people here are graduating high school seniors or college students. Some sophomores and juniors i think. Well, at least the people who post are :P
User avatar
Indagare
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:35 am

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Indagare »

Alex wrote:Isn't blood breaking the PG rating?
I really don't see how. In the first place it's pretty obviously fake blood and (as has been mentioned) probably about the same as any kid relatively the same age as Mile's cub would probably use. According to the Motion Picture Association:

"A PG-rated motion picture should be investigated by parents before they let their younger children attend. The PG rating indicates, in the view of the Rating Board, that parents may consider some material unsuitable for their children, and parents should make that decision.

The more mature themes in some PG-rated motion pictures may call for parental guidance. There may be some profanity and some depictions of violence or brief nudity. But these elements are not deemed so intense as to require that parents be strongly cautioned beyond the suggestion of parental guidance. There is no drug use content in a PG-rated motion picture."

http://universitytoolkit.org/FlmRat_Ratings.asp

According to TV Parental guidelines:

"This program contains material that parents may find unsuitable for younger children. Many parents may want to watch it with their younger children. The theme itself may call for parental guidance and/or the program may contain one or more of the following: some suggestive dialogue (D), infrequent coarse language (L), some sexual situations (S), or moderate violence (V)."

http://www.tvguidelines.org/ratings.htm

By either of these, I don't think the blood shown would qualify for the net higher rating which is:

"A PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should view the motion picture, as some material might not be suited for them. A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. The theme of the motion picture by itself will not result in a rating greater than PG-13, although depictions of activities related to a mature theme may result in a restricted rating for the motion picture. Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity in a PG-13 rated motion picture generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie, but generally not both realistic and extreme or persistent violence. A motion picture’s single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, initially requires at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive requires an R rating, as must even one of those words used in a sexual context. The Rating Board nevertheless may rate such a motion picture PG-13 if, based on a special vote by a two-thirds majority, the Raters feel that most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of those words in the motion picture is inconspicuous."

http://universitytoolkit.org/FlmRat_Ratings.asp

TV14:
"This program contains some material that many parents would find unsuitable for children under 14 years of age. Parents are strongly urged to exercise greater care in monitoring this program and are cautioned against letting children under the age of 14 watch unattended. This program may contain one or more of the following: intensely suggestive dialogue (D), strong coarse language (L), intense sexual situations (S), or intense violence (V)."

http://www.tvguidelines.org/ratings.htm
Image"Remember kids, only you can prevent a fiery apocalypse!"
ctcmjh

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by ctcmjh »

Indagare wrote:stuff
Image
User avatar
Esquire Fox
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:48 pm
Location: Bork, Bork, Bork! (Sweden)

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Esquire Fox »

O_O

I'll have to save that down somewhere. You know... incase I need a written report on content ratings some time :lol:.
- Esquire Fox

What do you mean that's not what the signature is for?
User avatar
Typhon
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:16 am
Location: In my house. Reading housepets. And organic chemistry.

Re: One-Offs: Set #12

Post by Typhon »

Who knew a drawing with a blood so fake it might have been spilled fruit juice could spark such an intense debate.
Post Reply