The same way I get uncomfortable with filler arcs and strips only for the sake of the laughs. Ricky can't please us all at the same time as it was said before. We have to wait until we get an arc that we like. I don't want sound mean, but if something happens in this comic that I would hate I would simply stop reading and wouldn't nag the writter about it.ChewyChewy wrote:At the risk of continuing the off-topic, I agree--and that's why I'm going to continue to keep up with the comics, because I am now, as I always was, impressed with everything about it.
My discomfort with some of the content is not a legitimate criticism but a subjective opinion, and if that's what Rick wants to put into his comic I'm not going to fault him for it, especially since all objective elements are spot-on, enough for me to enjoy, and I don't have to pay anything for it so I can't get "taken" no matter what happens that I don't like. But at the same time I have the right to voice my opinion and SAY that I'm not comfortable with it. It's just one complaint among a sea of praise.
@Phoenix: That's to be expected, though, unless Rick were to do like a buffer system and update every day of the week, or something....
Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Shameless advertisement of my fanfics: http://www.fanfiction.net/u/880961/Angelus-alvus
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Housepets! is far from not silly. Everything, even the more dramatic arcs, is silly and ridiculous.
I really doubt Rick would be the type to do occult writing.
I just like to think of the cosmic nerds as fictional characters who are just "powerful" just like people like Tarot, only on a larger scale. Warcraft has its Jaina Proudmores, but it also has its Sargerases, yaknow? I don't see that as occult themes so much as an author creating a whole universe right down to the lower levels of the cosmology.ChewyChewy wrote:I don't mean to be insulting or condemning when I use that word (though I don't use it lightly) but I think it IS a good word. It was harmless fantasy stuff, or seemed so to me, up until the last King arc, with the "cosmic nerds" or whatever they are. Now it's going places that make me uncomfortable.Sleet wrote:I think "occult" is not a good word for it. The comic just explores fantasy themes occasionally, and that includes a strange cosmology based on mythology, fantasy fiction, and real religion.ChewyChewy wrote:Maybe it's just subjective, but this whole occult thing in the comic is starting to creep me out.... I used to think this was the kind of comic I might have drawn myself, but not anymore....
I really doubt Rick would be the type to do occult writing.
![Image](http://pile.randimg.net/0/16/4035/Signature.png)
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I like both types of arcs really (in fact the only ones I don't really like are the Spot arcs) I just kind of wish (and with what Rick said earlier in the topic it kind of sounds like he wants to do with the Cosmic Nerds Plot anyway) the Plot arcs were a bit more frequent and actually explained things more.
Anyway to get this back on topic I wonder who will catch the Watch. I'm going with either Fox or Fido myself and if no one does I can't wait to see what will happen to King since we can't speculate on that with any accuracy since we know very little about the watch at all really.
Anyway to get this back on topic I wonder who will catch the Watch. I'm going with either Fox or Fido myself and if no one does I can't wait to see what will happen to King since we can't speculate on that with any accuracy since we know very little about the watch at all really.
- ChewyChewy
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:23 pm
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Well, I don't expect to find something in this comic that I HATE enough to go to that extreme.
I don't accuse Rick of doing "occult writing", even less of him actually BEING an occultist, I'm just saying that, while I was on board with all the tarot cards and ouija boards and the existence of Pete and his ability to change Joel's species, those elements seem to be more prominent lately, especially since the "cosmic nerds" were introduced. And it doesn't feel silly and mocking and how it should feel, but serious and even DARK. It doesn't feel to me like the same kind of "artificial mythology" of, say, "Slightly Damned". This doesn't even feel to me like the kind of comic that NEEDS (or SHOULD have) an artificial mythology, at least not one like this. Granted I see what he's doing with the cosmic nerds, he's doing a parody of people who play D&D, and I'm fine with that. But when you get into the possibility of characters being erased from existence on top of everything else, well, I guess that's the threshold where I felt too uncomfortable with it to hold my tongue about it anymore. It just doesn't feel like the kind of "so over-the-top it's funny" sort of annihilation that you see in, say, Back to the Future.
I'm really not trying to be a stick in the mud, and Rick can draw and write whatever he wants, I'm just giving my opinion and trying to back it up.
I don't accuse Rick of doing "occult writing", even less of him actually BEING an occultist, I'm just saying that, while I was on board with all the tarot cards and ouija boards and the existence of Pete and his ability to change Joel's species, those elements seem to be more prominent lately, especially since the "cosmic nerds" were introduced. And it doesn't feel silly and mocking and how it should feel, but serious and even DARK. It doesn't feel to me like the same kind of "artificial mythology" of, say, "Slightly Damned". This doesn't even feel to me like the kind of comic that NEEDS (or SHOULD have) an artificial mythology, at least not one like this. Granted I see what he's doing with the cosmic nerds, he's doing a parody of people who play D&D, and I'm fine with that. But when you get into the possibility of characters being erased from existence on top of everything else, well, I guess that's the threshold where I felt too uncomfortable with it to hold my tongue about it anymore. It just doesn't feel like the kind of "so over-the-top it's funny" sort of annihilation that you see in, say, Back to the Future.
I'm really not trying to be a stick in the mud, and Rick can draw and write whatever he wants, I'm just giving my opinion and trying to back it up.
Last edited by ChewyChewy on Mon May 30, 2011 9:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
![Image](http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/3221/sig20donecopy.png)
PF chars
"We have to do this take again! HAL, do it with a LOT less emotion!"
"I'm sorry Stan, I'm afraid I can't do that."
--Phoenix
pair-o-dimes dot blogspot dot com
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I would like it if the cosmic drama had more humor. It seems a bit dark, it shouldn't be slapstick, but maybe a some joke only smarty-heads would get? Of course, it might, and I could just not be a smarty-head enough to get it. And the Spot arcs are only good when Grape is involved.
yuki wrote: It is purpose that created us, purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines us, purpose that binds us.
-
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 am
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Hey, I like Spot arcs fine, as long as their timing is good. YES, EXACTLY. Once again, the LENGTH.IceKitsune wrote:I like both types of arcs really (in fact the only ones I don't really like are the Spot arcs) I just kind of wish (and with what Rick said earlier in the topic it kind of sounds like he wants to do with the Cosmic Nerds Plot anyway) the Plot arcs were a bit more frequent and actually explained things more.
Anyway to get this back on topic I wonder who will catch the Watch. I'm going with either Fox or Fido myself and if no one does I can't wait to see what will happen to King since we can't speculate on that with any accuracy since we know very little about the watch at all really.
Well, I say no one catches it. As a matter of fact, I can't say WHAT exactly is going to happen.
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I strongly doubt Sabrina could actually unmake Fido even if she wanted to. That was just her being very... forceful.
I have threatened to kick people in half before despite the fact that I could probably only manage to bisect someone down 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of their body on a good kick. Why couldn't a magical cat threaten to erase people from existence?
I have threatened to kick people in half before despite the fact that I could probably only manage to bisect someone down 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of their body on a good kick. Why couldn't a magical cat threaten to erase people from existence?
![Image](http://pile.randimg.net/0/16/4035/Signature.png)
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- ChewyChewy
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:23 pm
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I'm going to try to make this the last time I say it because by now I'm only repeating myself.Sleet wrote:I strongly doubt Sabrina could actually unmake Fido even if she wanted to. That was just her being very... forceful.
I get that. I do. But aside from the fact that 1) she still specifically threatened that, and 2) Fido took her seriously enough to do what she said, the elements that I'm referring to as "occult" make me believe that, at least in theory, it COULD be possible--if not for Sabrina then for SOMEONE. I find that very frightening and disturbing and outside of the tone I'd come to expect from the comic. That combined with the fact that so many people were criticizing FIDO for doing NOTHING rather than SABRINA for the above prompted me to speak because it really confused me that their priorities would be thus.
[/rant]
![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Image](http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/3221/sig20donecopy.png)
PF chars
"We have to do this take again! HAL, do it with a LOT less emotion!"
"I'm sorry Stan, I'm afraid I can't do that."
--Phoenix
pair-o-dimes dot blogspot dot com
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I think I have a new hero.Sleet wrote:
I have threatened to kick people in half before despite the fact that I could probably only manage to bisect someone down 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of their body on a good kick.
Also, where are they? It looks like a theatre.
yuki wrote: It is purpose that created us, purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines us, purpose that binds us.
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
To make someone "never born" is weird time junk, which I'm pretty sure Rick doesn't allow for his comic. I'm not sure, so I'm avoiding speaking for him.ChewyChewy wrote:I'm going to try to make this the last time I say it because by now I'm only repeating myself.Sleet wrote:I strongly doubt Sabrina could actually unmake Fido even if she wanted to. That was just her being very... forceful.
I get that. I do. But aside from the fact that 1) she still specifically threatened that, and 2) Fido took her seriously enough to do what she said, the elements that I'm referring to as "occult" make me believe that, at least in theory, it COULD be possible--if not for Sabrina then for SOMEONE. I find that very frightening and disturbing and outside of the tone I'd come to expect from the comic. That combined with the fact that so many people were criticizing FIDO for doing NOTHING rather than SABRINA for the above prompted me to speak because it really confused me that their priorities would be thus.
[/rant]
![Image](http://pile.randimg.net/0/16/4035/Signature.png)
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
-
- Extremerator
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:19 pm
- Location: a place of settlement, activity, or residence
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I think it's Bino's garage dressed up as a club... not sure though.Koda wrote:I think I have a new hero.Sleet wrote:
I have threatened to kick people in half before despite the fact that I could probably only manage to bisect someone down 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of their body on a good kick.
Also, where are they? It looks like a theatre.
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Yeah I'm sure its thisCaptainPea wrote:I think it's Bino's garage dressed up as a club... not sure though.Koda wrote:I think I have a new hero.Sleet wrote:
I have threatened to kick people in half before despite the fact that I could probably only manage to bisect someone down 2/3 or maybe 3/4 of their body on a good kick.
Also, where are they? It looks like a theatre.
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I will not ask you to repeat yourself Chewy, but may I explain why some of us find humor in Sabrina's statement?
It first and foremost plays on our enjoyment at Sabrina getting the one-up on one of the guys (especially characters like Fido and Maxwell who always seem in control of everything else in their lives).
But also, the statement is removed from reality (the real reality not Housepets reality), so we can delegate it to a fantastical realm where consequences are able to be over-looked.
I realize that the second point is not something you feel capable of doing, but this is why many other people found this funny rather than taking it seriously.
---
As for the people ganging up on Fido, I would like to note that your anger at seeing him standing outside doing nothing is the desire to make him a more 2-dimensional character than he is. Rick has a very solid grasp on personality, and Fido is doing nothing out of character. He's just doing something outside the 2D superhero type personality that you were expecting him to be. Please allow his character to grow and expand.
It first and foremost plays on our enjoyment at Sabrina getting the one-up on one of the guys (especially characters like Fido and Maxwell who always seem in control of everything else in their lives).
But also, the statement is removed from reality (the real reality not Housepets reality), so we can delegate it to a fantastical realm where consequences are able to be over-looked.
I realize that the second point is not something you feel capable of doing, but this is why many other people found this funny rather than taking it seriously.
---
As for the people ganging up on Fido, I would like to note that your anger at seeing him standing outside doing nothing is the desire to make him a more 2-dimensional character than he is. Rick has a very solid grasp on personality, and Fido is doing nothing out of character. He's just doing something outside the 2D superhero type personality that you were expecting him to be. Please allow his character to grow and expand.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/wc2wJb6.jpg)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Jake let him do that? Wow, cool owner.
Chewy, I highly doubt Fido thought she could do that, or even something close to that. He just saw that his girlfriend was VERY serious about something, and thought it would be good to help her.
Chewy, I highly doubt Fido thought she could do that, or even something close to that. He just saw that his girlfriend was VERY serious about something, and thought it would be good to help her.
yuki wrote: It is purpose that created us, purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines us, purpose that binds us.
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Another reason I love this comic.Obbl wrote:As for the people ganging up on Fido, I would like to note that your anger at seeing him standing outside doing nothing is the desire to make him a more 2-dimensional character than he is. Rick has a very solid grasp on personality, and Fido is doing nothing out of character. He's just doing something outside the 2D superhero type personality that you were expecting him to be. Please allow his character to grow and expand.
![Image](http://data.solirax.org/hp/48x48/haha.png)
![Image](http://i.picasion.com/pic41/165827ccc3515b8969ce28f32baf8781.gif)
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Actually I just thought of a cool ending to this arc (IMO anyway and it most likely won't happen) the watch is caught by some other Dog that has just walked into the club and everyone is kind of shocked for a moment as he just walks away with the watch. It turns out that the dog was the person from Heaven coming to collect it.
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I thought of that as well. It's possible, but I'm not sure how likely it would be. The most drama/action/tension would ensue, I think, if Fox caught it.IceKitsune wrote:Actually I just thought of a cool ending to this arc (IMO anyway and it most likely won't happen) the watch is caught by some other Dog that has just walked into the club and everyone is kind of shocked for a moment as he just walks away with the watch. It turns out that the dog was the person from Heaven coming to collect it.
![Image](http://i.picasion.com/pic41/165827ccc3515b8969ce28f32baf8781.gif)
-
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 am
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Well, that would be INTERESTING, but then what?
Where does the story go with only two updates (ONE, after that.)?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Ummmm I really don't think there is a way to do anything more with the arc after really. I would guess an epilogue of basically where Pete is now kind of giving that part some closure.PhoenixAsper wrote:Well, that would be INTERESTING, but then what?Where does the story go with only two updates (ONE, after that.)?
-
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 am
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Soooooo, Fox catches it, and then a cliffhanger?IceKitsune wrote:Ummmm I really don't think there is a way to do anything more with the arc after really. I would guess an epilogue of basically where Pete is now kind of giving that part some closure.PhoenixAsper wrote:Well, that would be INTERESTING, but then what?Where does the story go with only two updates (ONE, after that.)?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
- ChewyChewy
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:23 pm
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Unless this is a twofer like the farm arc....
![Image](http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/3221/sig20donecopy.png)
PF chars
"We have to do this take again! HAL, do it with a LOT less emotion!"
"I'm sorry Stan, I'm afraid I can't do that."
--Phoenix
pair-o-dimes dot blogspot dot com
-
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 am
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
True. In which case Rick is doing a VERY good job of hiding that.ChewyChewy wrote:Unless this is a twofer like the farm arc....
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I hope Pete gets what's coming to 'im.
By which I mean 75 experience points in D&D Cosmic Edition.
By which I mean 75 experience points in D&D Cosmic Edition.
yuki wrote: It is purpose that created us, purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines us, purpose that binds us.
- IceKitsune
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Oh sorry I for some reason thought you were talking about my idea for how it would end.PhoenixAsper wrote:Soooooo, Fox catches it, and then a cliffhanger?IceKitsune wrote:Ummmm I really don't think there is a way to do anything more with the arc after really. I would guess an epilogue of basically where Pete is now kind of giving that part some closure.PhoenixAsper wrote:Well, that would be INTERESTING, but then what?Where does the story go with only two updates (ONE, after that.)?
I don't like the sound of that...
![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Edit: What also could happen is that King could pull the "He was my former owner/related to my owner" thing to get it from him after Fox asks him why he wants it so much. That might work but again could also damage their relationship as well.
Yeah that would be even better actually but I don't think soPhoenixAsper wrote:True. In which case Rick is doing a VERY good job of hiding that.ChewyChewy wrote:Unless this is a twofer like the farm arc....![]()
Last edited by IceKitsune on Mon May 30, 2011 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I don't know if you people read the comments, so I'll just leave this here...
![Image](http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3637/estranglefinalstripsmal.jpg)
sneak off to bed, and hope for the best
![Image](http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/3637/estranglefinalstripsmal.jpg)
sneak off to bed, and hope for the best
"[E]ven with simple tools, you too can make awesome."
―November 21, 2010
―November 21, 2010
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I don't get it.
yuki wrote: It is purpose that created us, purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines us, purpose that binds us.
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Rick looks buff in that comic.
![Image](http://pile.randimg.net/0/16/4035/Signature.png)
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
- Keeshah
- Game Master
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 12:12 am
- Location: out marking the bushes an fire hydrants
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Viath wrote:I just want to say wow. The major topic of discussion for the last comic seemed to be Bino and people accusing/defending him. It seems very abrupt to me that now with the current comic we've suddenly switched to Fido. Everyone is shocked at him just doing nothing.
Fido is the pet community’s leader, working hard every day to help the pets in need, promote adoptions, and keep the peace between cat and dog. On top of that, he was hired on by the local police department for their K-9 program, participates in a number of track and field tournaments, and teaches pups to read in his spare time.
Rav/Ravage (RV) - M - German King Shepard: Str-7 Per-6 End-7 Cha-5 Int-5 Agi-6 Luck-6
Foxy Brown (Zootopia) - M - Coyote/RedWolf: Str-6 Per-7 End-6 Cha-4 Int-8 Agi-7 Luck-4
Oreo (RA) - M - Spotted Skunk: Str-5 Per-6 End-6 Cha-5 Int-7 Agi-8 Luck-5
Foxy Brown (Zootopia) - M - Coyote/RedWolf: Str-6 Per-7 End-6 Cha-4 Int-8 Agi-7 Luck-4
Oreo (RA) - M - Spotted Skunk: Str-5 Per-6 End-6 Cha-5 Int-7 Agi-8 Luck-5
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
I feel like that was pointing at my particular comment...D:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
if Fox catches it, in my opinion, it would happen in panel 1. Especially if it is another double strip, you could have plenty of resolving action in the Wednesday comic and finish it up in the final one on Friday.PhoenixAsper wrote:Well, that would be INTERESTING, but then what?Where does the story go with only two updates (ONE, after that.)?
EDIT:
@Keeshah I know who Fido is, I was commenting on the abrupt switch in focus on the forum from criticizing Bino to criticizing Fido.
![Image](http://i.picasion.com/pic41/165827ccc3515b8969ce28f32baf8781.gif)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Now hold it, Obbl!Obbl wrote:As for the people ganging up on Fido, I would like to note that your anger at seeing him standing outside doing nothing is the desire to make him a more 2-dimensional character than he is. Rick has a very solid grasp on personality, and Fido is doing nothing out of character. He's just doing something outside the 2D superhero type personality that you were expecting him to be. Please allow his character to grow and expand.
I love the idea of 3D characters and that's precisely the main reason I love this comic. Rick has the precious ability to make characters evolve in arcs, rather than give us a progressive evolution on a daily-based comic, such as Kevin and Kell, for example. Given the proper circumstances, and it has ALWAYS happened so far, we've been pleasantly surprised (hey, Sasha's smarter than you thought!), left puzzled in others (the Cosmic Nerds really gave an unexpected but interesting twist to the comic) and left panifully hanging on a dearest theme (grapenut still stuck in the friend zone but with a clear evolution)...
What happened with THIS arc and with this comic is that we saw something not only surprising, but totally out of character. Nothing in what we saw of Fido, so far, nothing in the cast page, could make us believe that he'd stand out there and allow for bullyism, destruction of property (a watch, duh, but still something a K9 cop on the scene is not supposed to allow).
It's not my 'oh, I want Fido 2D!'. It's: 'Heck, a nice guy like him, who challenged Bino into readmitting cat-lover peanut in the club, the guy who kept a feral mouse with him, the guy who, for the love of a cat would risk his career at the corps, now decides that his brother, the same one who had just mistreated Joey (also his brother, what's him then, chopped liver?), can be ubermeanie because he's too spineless to tell him 'no?'.
Even worse, as we have just seen in this comic, Fido has just the authority to stop Bino on the spot. it didn't even take this great an effort.
So, yes, this 'development' is quite ill-timed.
So, Foxstar accuses me of reading into things, but you ask to assume that 'everything we know might be a lie', to...read into things?rickgriffin wrote:I don't get why people take everything that every character says as gospel. People rarely take into account that characters might be misinformed, making junk up, lying, generalizing, assuming, dismissive, or all of the above.
Or even that they're telling the truth. Fido doesn't WANT to be lauded as a hero. And everyone assumed that was a straightforward humility play. What if he's actually too honest? What if he knows he doesn't deserve it because of things like this?
It's always a poor thing to assume when someone's acting from a vice that they must have no qualms about it.
Do i smell Catch-22?
Because Bino is Bino. Fido is the surprise of the day.Viath wrote:EDIT:
@Keeshah I know who Fido is, I was commenting on the abrupt switch in focus on the forum from criticizing Bino to criticizing Fido.
Last edited by valerio on Tue May 31, 2011 12:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Keeshah
- Game Master
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 12:12 am
- Location: out marking the bushes an fire hydrants
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
IceKitsune wrote: Anyway to get this back on topic I wonder who will catch the Watch. I'm going with either Fox or Fido myself and if no one does I can't wait to see what will happen to King since we can't speculate on that with any accuracy since we know very little about the watch at all really.
You know, I would like to see the watch hit the floor. an King getting hurt every time it bounces..
Then all the pets, including Bino can feel bad for King. Bino.. i smashed that watch with the hammer, i would have killed another pet!...
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
King then wakes up with Fox standing over him holding the watch.
Why does damage to this watch hurt you king..? i want to know the whole truth now.
Last edited by Keeshah on Tue May 31, 2011 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rav/Ravage (RV) - M - German King Shepard: Str-7 Per-6 End-7 Cha-5 Int-5 Agi-6 Luck-6
Foxy Brown (Zootopia) - M - Coyote/RedWolf: Str-6 Per-7 End-6 Cha-4 Int-8 Agi-7 Luck-4
Oreo (RA) - M - Spotted Skunk: Str-5 Per-6 End-6 Cha-5 Int-7 Agi-8 Luck-5
Foxy Brown (Zootopia) - M - Coyote/RedWolf: Str-6 Per-7 End-6 Cha-4 Int-8 Agi-7 Luck-4
Oreo (RA) - M - Spotted Skunk: Str-5 Per-6 End-6 Cha-5 Int-7 Agi-8 Luck-5
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Hmm, Fox might get it and then give a piece of his mind to King. so this year could end with a friendship broken, for now... ![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
And yet familial relationships just throw all that is logical into a curve ball.
Fido is aware of his brother's vast insecurities and doesn't know how to approach it. If he goes in there to break it up it jsut makes things worse. Bino makes sure to get back at him by getting back at King later. Or at the very least it feeds his ever growing paranoia. How does one handle the situation? Maybe if he lets this one thing play out, it'll lessen Bino's hostilities. Etc.
It reminds me of "The Death of a Salesman". Willy is obviously off his rocker and suicidal, and the way his family deals with it is by ignoring the problem and trying to keep him cheerful even to the point of lying.
Fido knows what is right, but doesn't know if he should be the one to act, because it might just make things worse. Maybe someone else will do the right thing, he might think. As he points out, Bino is being petty. Sure, a Mary Sue would step in and do the right thing all the time. But sometimes we don't know if the right thing to do is really the right thing to do.
For me, this is a very well-rounded character. As much as I would like for Fido to be the Mary Sue (cause my sense of justice is burning about now), I also recognize that characters are never cut and dry (or 2-dimensional, as I put it). To me, having him go in there is the equivalent of saying Fido is the TVtropes superhero with no real characterization. I much prefer a little darkness and strife mixed in with my hero of justice.
Fido is aware of his brother's vast insecurities and doesn't know how to approach it. If he goes in there to break it up it jsut makes things worse. Bino makes sure to get back at him by getting back at King later. Or at the very least it feeds his ever growing paranoia. How does one handle the situation? Maybe if he lets this one thing play out, it'll lessen Bino's hostilities. Etc.
It reminds me of "The Death of a Salesman". Willy is obviously off his rocker and suicidal, and the way his family deals with it is by ignoring the problem and trying to keep him cheerful even to the point of lying.
Fido knows what is right, but doesn't know if he should be the one to act, because it might just make things worse. Maybe someone else will do the right thing, he might think. As he points out, Bino is being petty. Sure, a Mary Sue would step in and do the right thing all the time. But sometimes we don't know if the right thing to do is really the right thing to do.
For me, this is a very well-rounded character. As much as I would like for Fido to be the Mary Sue (cause my sense of justice is burning about now), I also recognize that characters are never cut and dry (or 2-dimensional, as I put it). To me, having him go in there is the equivalent of saying Fido is the TVtropes superhero with no real characterization. I much prefer a little darkness and strife mixed in with my hero of justice.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/wc2wJb6.jpg)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
That much is true, literature and chronicles are filled with that.And yet familial relationships just throw all that is logical into a curve ball.
And letting him do has always helped, as we can see... Sorry for the sarcasm, but at this point Fido must be in total denial... No, the only reason for him to be so hush-hush with his jerk brother is that he fears that Bino could work even harder to find a flaw in Fido, thus making him discover of his 'illicit' relationship with Sabrina. yes, that might be a reasonable factor.Fido is aware of his brother's vast insecurities and doesn't know how to approach it. If he goes in there to break it up it jsut makes things worse. Bino makes sure to get back at him by getting back at King later. Or at the very least it feeds his ever growing paranoia. How does one handle the situation? Maybe if he lets this one thing play out, it'll lessen Bino's hostilities. Etc.
Fido is not being jerk.
he's just got too much too lose and can justify himself (loosely) by saying 'hey, it's stupid and petty and it gives me the excuse not to draw unwanted attention.'
I would even agree on that... But Fido has worked hard to become an exemplary dog. he can deny himself into saying 'it's just my nature', but he's got a strong sense of duty and of doing the right thing. he's supposed to be a peacekeeper, or at least that he tries.It reminds me of "The Death of a Salesman". Willy is obviously off his rocker and suicidal, and the way his family deals with it is by ignoring the problem and trying to keep him cheerful even to the point of lying.
Fido knows what is right, but doesn't know if he should be the one to act, because it might just make things worse. Maybe someone else will do the right thing, he might think. As he points out, Bino is being petty. Sure, a Mary Sue would step in and do the right thing all the time. But sometimes we don't know if the right thing to do is really the right thing to do.
For me, this is a very well-rounded character. As much as I would like for Fido to be the Mary Sue (cause my sense of justice is burning about now), I also recognize that characters are never cut and dry (or 2-dimensional, as I put it). To me, having him go in there is the equivalent of saying Fido is the TVtropes superhero with no real characterization. I much prefer a little darkness and strife mixed in with my hero of justice.
So, a good explanation is what I stated above: he's fighting hard against his fear of losing everything. And that makes him corruptible, more rounded, more interesting.
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Ah, and there lies your problem with this? If that is the case, I understand and apologize for my earlier outburst.valerio wrote:I would even agree on that... But Fido has worked hard to become an exemplary dog. he can deny himself into saying 'it's just my nature', but he's got a strong sense of duty and of doing the right thing. he's supposed to be a peacekeeper, or at least that he tries.
So, a good explanation is what I stated above: he's fighting hard against his fear of losing everything. And that makes him corruptible, more rounded, more interesting.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/wc2wJb6.jpg)
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
no prob.
I apologize too, but wow! It's been a LONG time since an arc kindled all the passion of this ol' fanboy. ![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
- Sleet
- Bringing Foxy Back
- Posts: 17291
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
- Location: Nephelokokkygia
- Contact:
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
Fido called it "really petty and stupid." He probably figured it was a bad idea to give Bino (and possibly King) attention for it.
![Image](http://pile.randimg.net/0/16/4035/Signature.png)
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
Re: Arc 42: Not All Dogs
As I said before, Fido might find the watch problem petty. Sure, I have nothing against this particular part. What makes me angry is that Fido's allowing Bino BULLY King. If it were a problem between Bino and King ONLY, then maybe there would be no problem in that. HOWEVER, Fido KNEW that King was being held against the ground by two MUCH bigger dogs and he just WALKED AWAY.Sleet wrote:Fido called it "really petty and stupid." He probably figured it was a bad idea to give Bino (and possibly King) attention for it.
I agree with everything Valerio said. There was NOTHING in the comic or cast page that showed this side of Fido. Is Fido a K9 who allows this kind of thing? He didn't even move a muscle about how Joey was treated for crying out loud.
It sure has been some time I had a heated conversation about a comic before.
Shameless advertisement of my fanfics: http://www.fanfiction.net/u/880961/Angelus-alvus