Vote for Housepets!

Discuss the comic here
Post Reply
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Vote for Housepets!

Post by rickgriffin »

http://www.ursamajorawards.org/Voting.htm

Look at that, I got nominated! Now, go finalize it!

(I realize I have no chance next to Lackadaisy but let's try anyway!)
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
User avatar
Dissension
Posts: 8840
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Dissension »

Voted for Housepets. I predict glorious victory.

...

Unless your fans let you down. Which we would never intentionally do.
avatar: milodesty

people are the only things that matter; take care of yourselves and each other
User avatar
Jumplion
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow?

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Jumplion »

Is...is it a bad thing that I've never heard of Lackadaisy until now?

Looks interesting though, I always love finding new webcomics to look at.

Still, since you're the only choice I know, you win by default ;P

EDIT: And "There She Is!" better FREAKIN' WIN!
Pfft, and they said I couldn't toast breakfast cereal. Now look who's laughing!

Take that, society!
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by rickgriffin »

Jumplion wrote:And "There She Is!" better FREAKIN' WIN!
I agree with this so hard it's not even funny
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
User avatar
Jumplion
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow?

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Jumplion »

rickgriffin wrote:
Jumplion wrote:And "There She Is!" better FREAKIN' WIN!
I agree with this so hard it's not even funny
I cried tears of manly happiness at the end.

Exagerated, sure, but I nearly tore up in tears! It was just so awesome. Shame it's over though.
Pfft, and they said I couldn't toast breakfast cereal. Now look who's laughing!

Take that, society!
User avatar
Jimmy Jazz
Posts: 846
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: My tower of hay

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Jimmy Jazz »

Jumplion wrote: It was just so awesome. Shame it's over though.
i agree with the "awesome" thing, but not the "shame its over" thing.
i'd rather have a really short and awesome series then have a awesome start
and then thin out and cut out in the middle of the story.
Image

what what? Jolly good time.
User avatar
Sinder
Posts: 1737
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:48 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Sinder »

If you really want to draw attention to this, you should post it on the front page where more people will see it.

(On an unrelated note, can you relax the filesize limits for avatars? It's hard to cram almost anything into 6 KB.)
ImageImage
ImageImage
merkamerka
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:35 pm
Location: \(●)/ NIPPON-PON!!

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by merkamerka »

^Agreed.

Also- you say your not going to win... but atleast your optimistic about it.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bootylicious

Bootylicious- It's in the dictionary.

Image

GOD DURNIT, STOP run a marathon ME AWF!!!
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by rickgriffin »

Sinder wrote: (On an unrelated note, can you relax the filesize limits for avatars? It's hard to cram almost anything into 6 KB.)
Increased to 24kb. You can PM me you know
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
Ebly
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Imagination!

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Ebly »

There she is must win or else I will be so upset you don't even know U:

Those are some pretty big comics there, with pretty big fanbases.
I'm nervous seeing stuff like Lackadaisy up there, it's making it harder than it should to vote.
Lul@Best Game category. The games they have in there, just... Huhuhuhu, anyway.
I still think Housepets has a fairly good chance (I mean, it was popular enough to get nominated after all) but I wouldn't be all that surprised if it was boxed out by other, larger comics.
I was going to make a joke but then I did.
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by rickgriffin »

Ebly wrote: Lul@Best Game category. The games they have in there, just... Huhuhuhu, anyway.
Games in the anthro category are rather sparse. Though now, I'm wondering why Ratchet and Clank Search for Booty wasn't on the recommended list; the scores for that were at least decent . . .
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
merkamerka
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:35 pm
Location: \(●)/ NIPPON-PON!!

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by merkamerka »

rickgriffin wrote:
Ebly wrote: Lul@Best Game category. The games they have in there, just... Huhuhuhu, anyway.
Games in the anthro category are rather sparse. Though now, I'm wondering why Ratchet and Clank Search for Booty wasn't on the recommended list; the scores for that were at least decent . . .

Oh lawdy lawd. So in order for it to actually fit in that catagory it has to fit inside the catagory of "anthro" It has to stand on 2 feet with fur? I would of loved to see nintendogs or maybe something that wasn't so meh-ish.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bootylicious

Bootylicious- It's in the dictionary.

Image

GOD DURNIT, STOP run a marathon ME AWF!!!
User avatar
rickgriffin
Site Admin
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Greetings from beautiful Place!
Contact:

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by rickgriffin »

Pretty sure Nintendogs wasn't qualified
I'm sure the cold hand of science will be able to overcome his magical powers
Ebly
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Imagination!

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Ebly »

rickgriffin wrote:
Ebly wrote: Lul@Best Game category. The games they have in there, just... Huhuhuhu, anyway.
Games in the anthro category are rather sparse. Though now, I'm wondering why Ratchet and Clank Search for Booty wasn't on the recommended list; the scores for that were at least decent . . .
Well still, with everyone ignoring games from other countries. There are far better games out there, that's far more suitable for their standards, than has been translated for English. I mean, TWO sonic games? Spore? Kung Fu Panda!? U:
Either way this is totally something to get like that over, seriously. It doesn't affect me. U:
I was going to make a joke but then I did.
Ebly
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Imagination!

Re: Vote for Housepets!

Post by Ebly »

merkamerka wrote:Oh lawdy lawd. So in order for it to actually fit in that catagory it has to fit inside the catagory of "anthro" It has to stand on 2 feet with fur? I would of loved to see nintendogs or maybe something that wasn't so meh-ish.
This may not be true, but I've found that what people usually refer to as anthropomorphism is really more suited to be called zoomorphism. It's more humanoid characters with animalistic features than animal characters with humanoid features. So something like UMA... yeah, chances are you'll see more human-with-fur things than animals-that-can-talk things. Though, Nintendogs and the like doesn't really count, since they're supposed to be proper animals, without human features, so they're not really anthro.
I was going to make a joke but then I did.
Post Reply