Animal bodies?

Discuss the comic here
Post Reply
JageshemashFTW
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:28 pm

Animal bodies?

Post by JageshemashFTW »

So after seeing Sofia for these past few comics, I can't help but ponder something...

What are the rules for anthropomorphization (god, I hope I spelled that right) in this world?

I mean, dogs, cats, ferrets, skunks, raccoons, opossums, they all stand up right, have opposable thumbs, and plantigrade legs.

But then you have ungulates like camels and horses who, intelligence and speech aside, don't show any signs of anthro-ness or kangaroos like Bruce and Roosevelt who, as far as I can tell, are also largely unchanged from their real-world counterparts.
Welcome to HexCom: viewtopic.php?t=5602
NHWestoN
Posts: 19292
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:09 pm
Location: North of Boston Boy

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by NHWestoN »

Don't know, Jag, but i'd speculate that it's trying to balance reality and fantasy. Dogs, cats, mice, birds, ferals like Ink, Cory, and Jessica can transformed in bipeds comfortably, and the size ratios (except for the mice) are not too far varied. Thus Peanut, Grape, Zachary, King, Bailey, Keene, and humans can interact without the challenge of too large or too small. With horses, cows, camels, deer, having them walk erect would also require anatomical adjustments that might be destorting beyond the "rules of Housepets! realism". They'd be pretty bulky - like the Bear - and hard to fI t into a panel. There's a darker issue, too..

Except for Zach Rabbit, most of the characters are carnivores. Kinda hard t o have a deer character with the Wolf Pack massacring ungulates on a weekly schedule. Zootopia dances around the same issue. Peanut, for example, tells the horse on Uncle Reuben's Farm, "You all look so delicious!". To which the horses nonchalantly reply, "Yeah, we get that a lot."

My thoughts, anyhow. Regards.
User avatar
Sleet
Bringing Foxy Back
Posts: 17291
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 am
Location: Nephelokokkygia
Contact:

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Sleet »

If I had to guess, only some animals are anthro, whereas others aren't. I doubt there's anthro and normal counterparts of the same species.
Image
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Friendly banter? Feel free to click the "PM" button below!
User avatar
Buster
Game Master
Posts: 5379
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:26 pm
Location: Σ Disturbing Exploding Face

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Buster »

I don't think it has anything to do with predator/prey. there are TONS of humanized prey animals in the Forrest, Zach met them at one point, and as far as i remember only the deer was unaltered, and we already know rabbits, mice, and rats are humanized, and grape is still prone to eating mice that get in her way.

all of those humanized are mammals with Digitigrade or Plantigrade legs, none of them have Unguligrade legs. We've also never seen a single proper Digitigrade mammal that wasn't humanized.
Most important thing I've learned from D&D?
No matter how tempting it may be, as a DM I can't both present a problem and solve it.
Every time a DMPC or NPC fixes something a payer couldn't i'm diminishing and undermining that player's contribution.
NHWestoN
Posts: 19292
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:09 pm
Location: North of Boston Boy

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by NHWestoN »

Agreed, Buster, in that none of the animals are "dumb" (that is, speechless animals); in fact, except for Sophie, they all speak English or else a tongue conveniently translated for us. When Bino is trying to become a Spot, he and the hawk he lands on immediately understand each other. As to prey and predator undercurrents, the wolves and their culinary conversations carry that load - enthusiastically. Other wise, since Grape stomped and swallowed Karl-Marx Faust mouse pretty early in the epic, I don't believe we've had any casualties to natural dining urges.

But, remember, after Zach is introduced to all the ferals, his memorable, somewhat chilling benediction to them is "I hope you don't get eaten!" Similarly, there are pet animals and working animals. Just as in Animal Farm, so in Housepets society. "All pigs are created equal, but some are more equal than others." Even in speech, there are strata in humanization. C.S. Lewis in his Narnia stories raised "talking animals" to the status of full humanity; animals who can't talk can be hunted, killed, and eaten. In BabGardens, except for Karishad ... who is truly in a class by himself ... ferals do not seem to talk to or in the presence of humans. Does that make them less human than pets ... or certain other domesticated animals, again, like Sophie?

I'm probably over thinking the question. I don't think it's a rule Rick keeps in a thick manual beside the coffee pot. It's still a good question. Regards.
User avatar
D-Rock
Moderator
Posts: 9321
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:25 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by D-Rock »

Well, Jess has spoken to humans twice; the limerick guy and a random dude at the fair. In real life, feral animals tend to avoid human contact to begin with. Grape and Max did have a little talk as to who would get a dead bird they found, only for the bird to retort that he wasn't dead. And then he got stomped. Managed to survive that, too. No word on if he was eaten. Fido also threatened to drop Spo off on a cat he knew wouldn't be so kind to him early on. Rabbit-hunting is even mentioned by Jack at the Wolves Christmas party when King proposed to Bailey.

The normal food chain is still there, it's just that all the animals are sentient. Except maybe cows, bugs, and fish. No word on those. This is just normal for them.

I think I saw on Facebook that Rick did consider making the horses anthropomorphic as well, but dropped the idea. I can't recall his exact words, something along the lines of "too weird even for that world?"
Faith doesn't change circumstances. Faith changes me.
Image
Image
Avatar by CHAOKOCartoons
User avatar
Buster
Game Master
Posts: 5379
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:26 pm
Location: Σ Disturbing Exploding Face

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Buster »

probably because it brings to mind those ridiculous rubber horse mask guy pictures/videos from seven years ago.
Most important thing I've learned from D&D?
No matter how tempting it may be, as a DM I can't both present a problem and solve it.
Every time a DMPC or NPC fixes something a payer couldn't i'm diminishing and undermining that player's contribution.
User avatar
D-Rock
Moderator
Posts: 9321
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:25 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by D-Rock »

Oh, wow, that old?

Anyway, I think we can currently generalize that ungulates are their normal selves in this universe.
Faith doesn't change circumstances. Faith changes me.
Image
Image
Avatar by CHAOKOCartoons
NHWestoN
Posts: 19292
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:09 pm
Location: North of Boston Boy

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by NHWestoN »

Is the limerick a feral?
User avatar
D-Rock
Moderator
Posts: 9321
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:25 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by D-Rock »

Image



...that might not be inaccurate.
Faith doesn't change circumstances. Faith changes me.
Image
Image
Avatar by CHAOKOCartoons
User avatar
Obbl
Smiley McSmiles
Posts: 3231
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: The Housepets Forum ^^

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Obbl »

rickgriffin wrote:All mammals, reptiles and birds [are sentient]. Some larger fish are (sharks), only pawwed mammals are bipedal.
Image
User avatar
D-Rock
Moderator
Posts: 9321
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:25 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by D-Rock »

Well, that was easy.
Faith doesn't change circumstances. Faith changes me.
Image
Image
Avatar by CHAOKOCartoons
User avatar
dusk
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:29 pm
Location: Babylon Gardens?

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by dusk »

Staples XD
As I gaze upon the stars, I realize how much I will miss this world.

20-23-5-14-20-25 25-5-1-18-19 8-5 4-9-4 14-15-20 18-5-20-21-18-14,

20-8-5 19-9-24 6-9-14-7-5-18-5-4 13-9-19-6-9-20 23-9-20-8 12-15-20-19 15-6 6-21-18.


*Russian Intensifies*
NHWestoN
Posts: 19292
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:09 pm
Location: North of Boston Boy

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by NHWestoN »

I'd have a more sophisticated response but it's kinda late, the oat bag's ready, and typing on a keyboard is just so inept with hooves. Regards.
User avatar
SuperStar
Posts: 2825
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:51 am
Location: Shining in the Boonies of Thailand

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by SuperStar »

Buster wrote: all of those humanized are mammals with Digitigrade or Plantigrade legs, none of them have Unguligrade legs. We've also never seen a single proper Digitigrade mammal that wasn't humanized.
Image
Squirrel on the first panel. Check and mate. :P
User avatar
Buster
Game Master
Posts: 5379
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:26 pm
Location: Σ Disturbing Exploding Face

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Buster »

both leg types can sit that way. that doesn't prove anything.
Most important thing I've learned from D&D?
No matter how tempting it may be, as a DM I can't both present a problem and solve it.
Every time a DMPC or NPC fixes something a payer couldn't i'm diminishing and undermining that player's contribution.
User avatar
Douglas Collier
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:35 pm
Location: Housepets! Universe - Babylon Gardens

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Douglas Collier »

SuperStar wrote:
Buster wrote: all of those humanized are mammals with Digitigrade or Plantigrade legs, none of them have Unguligrade legs. We've also never seen a single proper Digitigrade mammal that wasn't humanized.
Image
Squirrel on the first panel. Check and mate. :P
Closer inspection of said species:
Image
Douglas isn't my real name, but because of a name block put on me by a higher-order being known as Djinni, I can't say my real name.
Not A Furry

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by Not A Furry »

Image
NHWestoN
Posts: 19292
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:09 pm
Location: North of Boston Boy

Re: Animal bodies?

Post by NHWestoN »

Tri-ped? Hmmmm?
Post Reply