Housepets!

Still Peanut!

Definitely.

Still the same what I said the first time around.

I would have to say Joey, what can I say? I think dorks and geeks are so cute

Max and Fox without a doubt.

Sasha because she is a character who is smart but says and thinks things that normally a person would not say and I find it funny and cute.
XP

Okay, are we talking personality or appearance? Because if we're talking personality, then I agree with FarmMan, it's Sasha. But if we're talking appearance, I still say Tarot.

King again, of course.
Followed by Miles, I like his...naive kind. Dunno, somehow.
On third place there is peanut, with his cute secret crush(well not anymore) and the spot comic etc. =)

Welp. Bumped a year old thread. No matter. I'd say.. say... D: I cant decide. its like asking a parent which of his sons/daughters are their favorite. Just can't choose. x3 All of them! (derp)

I vote for Peanut! He is amazing and if he ran for president I would vote for him there too.

Puppy Peanut now is the winner.

Kitten Grape (because Housepets! babies set a new threshold for cuteness, and I'm a cat-lover).

Collarless Maxwell. Nuff said.

Though Grape would definitely be a contender. <3

my vote is with puppy Peanut.
<who can say that face isn't adorable

It's a contest between Peanut's adorableness and Maxwell's Charms in my opinion. X3

yay i revived a thread (i hope thats good o-o)

but they have never appeared in the comic. it can't be considered unless it has a separate tag.

Puppy Peanut is tagged separately, he counts as his own distinct character even though they're the same.

Obviously King is the cutest character ever!
Peanut and Grape tied second :P

I think it's more that we haven't seen most of the other characters AS puppies/kittens/kits/cubs/whatever. In my experience, animals are automatically cuter when they're younger about 95% of the time, so seeing Peanut/Grape/etc. as their younger selves makes them automatic contenders for the cutest, while those we haven't seen can't really be judged as anything but their current cuteness. Since we haven't seen their younger selves, we don't know just how much cuter they would be, so we can't just say they're automatically bumped up to the same level as the characters we HAVE seen.

I want to see little Karishad.

Who turns out to look just like present Karishad, further adding to how baffling he is.

KJOokami wrote:I think it's more that we haven't seen most of the other characters AS puppies/kittens/kits/cubs/whatever. In my experience, animals are automatically cuter when they're younger about 95% of the time, so seeing Peanut/Grape/etc. as their younger selves makes them automatic contenders for the cutest, while those we haven't seen can't really be judged as anything but their current cuteness. Since we haven't seen their younger selves, we don't know just how much cuter they would be, so we can't just say they're automatically bumped up to the same level as the characters we HAVE seen.

What. The 'baby' version of the characters were not that cute you know. Being younger does not automatically make you cuter, its more likely that a young baby is cuter than an adult but you can't assume that automatically. Maybe this is just me, but I did not find puppy Peanut and kitten Grape to be all that cute meaning they didn't become incredibly cute just because they are younger. Peanut and Grape was cute before and after.

Wanderer wrote:What. The 'baby' version of the characters were not that cute you know. Being younger does not automatically make you cuter, its more likely that a young baby is cuter than an adult but you can't assume that automatically. Maybe this is just me, but I did not find puppy Peanut and kitten Grape to be all that cute meaning they didn't become incredibly cute just because they are younger. Peanut and Grape was cute before and after.

KJOokami wrote:In my experience...

This is about our opinions on the matter; there is no such thing as "objective" cuteness. :p

Also, providing your opinion to "disprove" my opinion is a bit silly.

I was not trying to disprove you.
I obviously failed to elaborate on the intent of my post.
There needn't be a separate category for baby characters. They're just younger versions of preexisting characters.

Wanderer wrote:I was not trying to disprove you.
I obviously failed to elaborate on the intent of my post.
There needn't be a separate category for baby characters. They're just younger versions of preexisting characters.

Yeah, you probably should've elaborated because that's not at all what you said in your last post, which basically consisted of you saying that the puppy/kitten versions of the characters weren't that cute.

They don't become incredibly cuter that it blows off the competition so much that there needs to be a new category to make it fair to the other characters. (Which is what you are suggesting)
I didn't say they weren't cute, I was trying to say they weren't significantly cuter.

Wanderer wrote:The 'baby' version of the characters were not that cute you know.

Wanderer wrote:I did not find puppy Peanut and kitten Grape to be all that cute

...

Anyway.

Wanderer wrote:They don't become incredibly cuter that it blows off the competition so much that there needs to be a new category to make it fair to the other characters.

To me (Read: my opinion), they do. Adult animals are cute too, but, in my opinion, a kitten will almost always blow the same animal as an adult out of the water, as far as cuteness is concerned. That was my point from the start, which is why the tone of your original post struck me as odd, because you basically told me, "No, kittens/puppies aren't automatically cuter because I say so." Maybe that wasn't your intent, and if so, then I apologize for the misunderstanding, but this is really getting kinda repetitive. We're arguing about opinions, which obviously doesn't go very far.

The world itself effectively makes every character cute, except Pete he just makes me want to grab a big stick or Spirit Dragon but that's because her coolness effectively overrides her cuteness

MilesKingford wrote:doesn't seem to have a single personality flaw (yet).

That's kinda an insult to Rick.

Peanut's flawed, it's just that his flaws don't make him less cute.

If anything, they make him cuter.

Dr. Prower wrote:A tie between King and Sasha.

I agree, they are both soo overly cute!!

Sleet wrote:

MilesKingford wrote:doesn't seem to have a single personality flaw (yet).

That's kinda an insult to Rick.

Peanut's flawed, it's just that his flaws don't make him less cute.

I agree that Peanut has flaws, but I can never think of them off the top of my head.
Anyway Peanut is the cutest in my opinion.