Housepets!

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:16 am**

Roosevelt is totes adorbs. *giggles*

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:24 am**

I almost felt jealous looking at their media set-up. I am sure they miss home but life can't be all that bad at the zoo.

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:29 am**

Dissension wrote:Roosevelt is totes adorbs. *giggles*

Which one's Roosevelt?

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:30 am**

They're so adorable. <3

And kudos on the little details, like the "Foobal!" and the alt text. They both made me giggle.

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:32 am**

RandomGeekNamedBrent wrote:
Dissension wrote:Roosevelt is totes adorbs. *giggles*
Which one's Roosevelt?

Roosevelt is the dark-digited one

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:34 am**

Yay Kangaroos are awesome! They are both adorable

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:18 am**

The australian version of football would be Rugby, rite?

And luff the kangaroos they're so cute :3

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:20 am**

no, it's Australian rules football.

as the alt-text says, It's a combination of all sports, plus rugby again

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:56 am**

I wonder did they vote on Coca-Cola ad ending.

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:38 am**

They finally have names!

I hope they can appear more often.

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:18 am**

KICK HIM IN THE SHINS! SHOW HIM SHAME!

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:07 pm**

I wish I had their setup. I didnt even know zoos had T.V's

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:39 pm**

Well, I'm not Australian, but I suppose football over there is the same as here and the same for practically worldwide, except in USA where is called soccer. However, I know is just a joke, so please don't take me seriously

By the way, "ROOsvelt", I get the joke XD

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:59 pm**

Bruce wrote:Even if it is the sissy american version

Someone finally said it.
Also, this game should be called Handegg =)

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:33 pm**

Gren wrote:Well, I'm not Australian, but I suppose football over there is the same as here and the same for practically worldwide, except in USA where is called soccer. However, I know is just a joke, so please don't take me seriously

By the way, "ROOsvelt", I get the joke XD

no, Australian rules football is different from both American football and what most other countries call football, but it is closer to American football because the ball is an elliptical shape.

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:40 pm**

Gren wrote:Well, I'm not Australian, but I suppose football over there is the same as here and the same for practically worldwide, except in USA where is called soccer.

Soccer is another thing, what you know as "Fútbol" x3

Also, what are those australian rules supossed to go with?, being the last man stand? XD

Posted: **Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:42 pm**

I prefer Bruce myself. Roosevelt is too emotional to be one of my favorites.

Wait... is that habitat open air.... with a heater? Seems kind of useless to me...

I like the moon the most.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:09 am**

I just want to ask something before the tidal wave of shipping hits, are these guys a couple or are they cuddling to stay warm?

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:05 pm**

Radio Blue Heart wrote:I just want to ask something before the tidal wave of shipping hits, are these guys a couple or are they cuddling to stay warm?

olala!

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:45 pm**

Radio Blue Heart wrote:I just want to ask something before the tidal wave of shipping hits, are these guys a couple or are they cuddling to stay warm?

My guess is the former considering how they're talking in the first panel but I'm not sure it's entirely certain?

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:40 pm**

some say roosevelt is a girl but i dont know

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:44 pm**

Rick on Twitter wrote:They are both male

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:42 pm**

They look more like sort of best friends to me, although it would be cute if they were actually together, :3

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:31 pm**

who cares? Personally, it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not, I am not homophobic, and I hope no one here either

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:09 pm**

I don't think anyone even brought up that topic. People are just speculating if two characters seen cuddling are a couple or not.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:26 pm**

Is it impossible for two members of the same sex to be very close friends without their relationship being anything more than that?

Is it impossible to recognize the equality and innate goodness of homosexual people without it extending to condoning the latter kind of relationship?

Is it impossible to divorce the act from the person? I mean, of all the ways to identify yourself, why choose that? And what business is it of other people's anyway?

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:33 pm**

On second thought, it is not any of my business if they are.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:44 pm**

ChewyChewy wrote:Is it impossible for two members of the same sex to be very close friends without their relationship being anything more than that?

it is possible. But keep in mind people jump to the same type of conclusion with two people of the opposite sex who are very close friends.

also let it be known that on Twitter, in a conversation addressing whether or not they were both male as well as if they are in a relationship, Rick confirmed them to be male without denying a relationship.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:47 pm**

And that's a possibility too, that an opposite-sex couple might be just friends.

Anyway, I don't want to continue this topic, as I'll derail the thread. I think I've said what I wanted to say.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:57 pm**

ChewyChewy wrote: I think I've said what I wanted to say.

I think everyone has.... or should have.

I am sorry, but the whole no collar thing on any Housepets! animal character just seems weird after all the hubub of that one Bino arc.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:00 pm**

Was noticing the same thing.

Is "Nachos and Thou" a reference to Shakespeare or something?
It sounds vaguely familiar, and the correct use of "thou" makes me happy.

Posted: **Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:22 pm**

copper wrote:I think everyone has.... or should have.

I am sorry, but the whole no collar thing on any Housepets! animal character just seems weird after all the hubub of that one Bino arc.

I don't think it's weird, but seeing pets without collars as their definition without clothes is a funny topic to play with, since they are naked, but are starting to consider collars their definition of dignity =P

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:38 am**

Well the kangaroos aren't pets, so it didn't strike me as weird at all.

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:50 am**

I haven't elaborated on their relationship because of the tendency to make things a bigger deal than they are, and also because of the tendency of people to oversimplify things. I will however leave this here

: 2013-02-05_23-38-09_369.jpg (927.5 KiB) Viewed 26242 times

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:53 am**

That's super-cute and way too adorable. x3

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:55 am**

Sheepish smitten kangaroo. So cute. <3

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:02 am**

Heh at least hes branching out story wise

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:10 am**

Quite so.

Attention: Please file all claims against Peanut Butter Sandwich for 'sploded cerebrums with the Flakes of the Universe.

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:38 am**

Well, Peanut... it's certainly realistic. I'll give ya that. *giggles*

Posted: **Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:42 am**

rickgriffin wrote:I haven't elaborated on their relationship because of the tendency to make things a bigger deal than they are, and also because of the tendency of people to oversimplify things. I will however leave this here
2013-02-05_23-38-09_369.jpg

oversimplify what?
Peanut is still in love with Grape. Spirit Dragon is in love with Peanut and is competing with Tarot for his affection. King used to be a human. Joey is in love with a MOUSE.
What's to oversimplify? Bruce and Roosevelt are the most normal couple, so far

My adoration for you grows, Sir.

Housepets!

One-Offs Set Whatever

One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever

Re: One-Offs Set Whatever